Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 B 11/10, 1 B 11/10 (1 C 16/10) Généré par l'IA

Residence rights of former naturalized persons under § 38 AufenthG following retroactive revocation of naturalization

Numéro de cause 1 B 11/10, 1 B 11/10 (1 C 16/10)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's complaint and authorized the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court, allowing the case to proceed on the basis of its fundamental significance. The dispute concerned the legal status and residence rights of a foreign national whose naturalization had been revoked with retroactive effect, specifically whether the individual was considered a "former German" under § 38 of the Residence Act and whether the pre-naturalization residence permit continued to be valid or "revived" upon revocation. The decisive legal issue identified for review is the interpretation of § 38 AufenthG and the implications of the retroactive revocation of naturalization on the validity of prior residence titles.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 38 AufenthG; Residence rights of former naturalized persons under § 38 AufenthG following retroactive revocation of naturalization: The dispute concerned the legal status and residence rights of a foreign national whose naturalization had been revoked with retroactive effect, specifically whether the individual was considered a "former German" under § 38 of the Residence Act and whether the pre-naturalization residence permit continued to be valid or "revived" upon revocation. The decisive legal issue identified for review is the interpretation of § 38 AufenthG and the implications of the retroactive revocation of naturalization on the validity of prior residence titles.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révocation de l'autorisation de séjour autorisation de séjour loi sur les étrangers statut juridique positions administratives autorisation subséquente

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for allowing the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 38 AufenthG
Substantive provision concerning the status of a former German whose naturalization was revoked, which the court identified as the central question for clarification.
Généré par l'IA
1 C 16/10
Residence permit for former Germans after retroactive revocation of naturalization: analogous application of § 38 AufenthG and start of filing deadline
1 B 27/09, 1 B 27/09, 1 PKH 15/09 (1 C 2/10)
Survival or reactivation of an indefinite residence permit following retroactive revocation of naturalization
1 C 2/10
No revives of pre-naturalization residence permits after retroactive naturalization revocation
5 C 12/10
Revocation of Fraudulent Naturalization and Proportionality Limits on Loss of Union Citizenship
1 B 29/19
German naturalization requirement of abandoning prior citizenship: constitutionality and equality of exceptions allowing dual nationality despite subjective conscience or attachment conflicts

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for allowing the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 38 AufenthG

Substantive provision concerning the status of a former German whose naturalization was revoked, which the court identified as the central question for clarification.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Aufenthaltsrecht nach rückwirkender Aufhebung der Einbürgerung; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob ein Ausländer, dessen Einbürgerung ex tunc zurückgenommen wurde, ein ehemaliger Deutscher im Sinne des § 38 AufenthG ist bzw. ob der Aufenthaltstitel, den der Ausländer vor der Einbürgerung innehatte, im Fall einer rückwirkenden Aufhebung der Einbürgerung fortgilt oder "wiederauflebt" oder sich auf einen Anspruch auf Wiedererteilung eines solchen Aufenthaltstitels (hier: Niederlassungserlaubnis) auswirkt.