Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
3 B 75/09, 3 B 75/09 (3 C 6/10) Généré par l'IA

Allocation of fishing quotas and consideration of voyage permits as a suitability criterion for issuing fishing licenses

Numéro de cause 3 B 75/09, 3 B 75/09 (3 C 6/10)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for fundamental legal significance and referred the case to the Third Senate for a full review on the merits. The dispute concerns the allocation of fishing quotas and the exercise of discretion when issuing fishing permits under the Maritime Fisheries Act, specifically challenging whether a producer organization participating in small-scale high-sea fisheries can require authorities to consider, among other suitability criteria, whether competing applicants possess the necessary voyage permits. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates leave to appeal if a question of fundamental legal significance arises, here defining whether permit issuance must factor into the assessment of an applicant's performance capacity and suitability the availability of required voyage permits among other bidders.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Allocation of fishing quotas and consideration of voyage permits as a suitability criterion for issuing fishing licenses: The dispute concerns the allocation of fishing quotas and the exercise of discretion when issuing fishing permits under the Maritime Fisheries Act, specifically challenging whether a producer organization participating in small-scale high-sea fisheries can require authorities to consider, among other suitability criteria, whether competing applicants possess the necessary voyage permits. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates leave to appeal if a question of fundamental legal significance arises, here defining whether permit issuance must factor into the assessment of an applicant's performance capacity and suitability the availability of required voyage permits among other bidders.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exercice des droits civils espace maritime critères d'appréciation autorité administrative conservation des ressources biologiques de la mer exercice du pouvoir d'appréciation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance.
Généré par l'IA
3 C 6/10
Allocation of fishing quotas: Obligation to consider vessel safety certificates and permitted operational areas when assessing enterprise suitability under § 3 Abs. 2 Maritime Fisheries Act
3 B 18/20
Exclusion of crab-fishing vessels from Baltic Sea cod quotas: characterization of quota allocation as administrative act vs. legislative regulation under Sea Fisheries Act and equal treatment
7 A 9/09
Waterway expansion plan approval: duty to fairly balance fishing interests below the threshold of unbearable detriment and retroactive ratification of unauthorized representation
3 B 45/19
Scope of protection for fishing rights against water-law conditions on fish farm discharges and limits of the fact-finding duty regarding expert testimony on fish toxicity.
III ZR 99/22
Jurisdiction of state supreme court for fishing license disputes under Bavarian state law

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Aufteilung von Fischfangquoten; Ermessensausübung bei Erteilung von Fangerlaubnissen; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von der Beklagten geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO).

Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, unter anderem die Frage zu klären, ob eine an der Kleinen Hochseefischerei teilnehmende Erzeugergemeinschaft verlangen kann, dass bei der Erteilung von Fangerlaubnissen nach § 3 Abs. 2 des Seefischereigesetzes insbesondere wegen der dort genannten Kriterien der Leistungsfähigkeit und Eignung des Fischereibetriebes auch berücksichtigt wird, inwieweit andere Antragsteller über die erforderlichen Fahrterlaubnisscheine verfügen.