Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
3 B 8/20, 3 B 8/20 (3 C 7/21) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2021:290621B3B8.20.0 Généré par l'IA

Timing of lawfulness for animal welfare orders reiterating livestock housing requirements under the Animal Protection Act

Numéro de cause 3 B 8/20, 3 B 8/20 (3 C 7/21)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court reversed the lower court’s refusal and admitted the plaintiff's revision, ordering that the appeal proceed before the full bench. The dispute concerned the legality of an animal welfare order issued under German administrative law, specifically challenging which point in time determines the lawfulness of a regulatory measure that reiterates requirements already set out in the Animal Welfare Keeping and Care Regulation for livestock. The decisive legal basis for admitting the revision was the requirement to clarify a question of fundamental importance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, involving the interplay between the Animal Protection Act (§ 16a Abs. 1 S. 1, 2 Nr. 1; § 2 Nr. 1 TierSchG) and the Animal Welfare Keeping and Care Regulation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; Timing of lawfulness for animal welfare orders reiterating livestock housing requirements under the Animal Protection Act: The dispute concerned the legality of an animal welfare order issued under German administrative law, specifically challenging which point in time determines the lawfulness of a regulatory measure that reiterates requirements already set out in the Animal Welfare Keeping and Care Regulation for livestock. The decisive legal basis for admitting the revision was the requirement to clarify a question of fundamental importance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, involving the interplay between the Animal Protection Act (§ 16a Abs. 1 S. 1, 2 Nr. 1; § 2 Nr. 1 TierSchG) and the Animal Welfare Keeping and Care Regulation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit du logement motifs de révision question de principe législation vétérinaire protection juridique contrôles officiels, contrôles vétérinaires

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The provision cited as the main ground for ordering the admission of the revision due to a question of fundamental importance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as part of the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Cited as part of the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
Généré par l'IA
3 B 7/20, 3 B 7/20 (3 C 6/21)
Temporal basis for lawfulness of administrative orders repeating Animal Welfare-Useful Animal Keeping Regulation requirements
3 B 39/16, 3 B 39/16 (3 C 29/16)
Permissibility of culling chicks under German Animal Welfare Act: defining "reasonable ground" and the weight of economic interests
3 B 34/16
Scope of "repeated violation" in animal welfare bans and requirements for comprehensive care prohibitions under § 16a TierSchG
3 B 20/15, 3 B 20/15 (3 C 1/16)
Compatibility of Mink Farming Regulations with Legislative Reservation When Commercial Viability Is Undermined
3 B 16/24, 3 B 16/24 (3 C 2/25)
Permitting authorities to impose specific turkey housing standards under the general animal welfare clause absent a specific legislative decree

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The provision cited as the main ground for ordering the admission of the revision due to a question of fundamental importance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Cited as part of the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as part of the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Tierschutz

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Niedersächsischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss vom 29. November 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 5 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welcher Zeitpunkt für die Rechtmäßigkeit einer auf § 16a Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Satz 2 Nr. 1 i.V.m. § 2 Nr. 1 TierSchG gestützten Anordnung maßgebend ist, die den Inhalt bestimmter in der Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung geregelter Anforderungen wiederholt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.