Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 B 43/18, 9 B 43/18 (9 C 6/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:120919B9B43.18.0 Généré par l'IA

Limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief

Numéro de cause 9 B 43/18, 9 B 43/18 (9 C 6/19)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (9th Senate) allowed an appeal on points of law to the higher court, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs' complaint for leave to appeal. The dispute concerned the limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief (Unterlassungsansprüche). The court determined that the case possesses fundamental significance, as it requires the higher court to further develop the legal doctrine regarding the statute of limitations applicable to such claims under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, and ordered the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute for the subsequent appellate proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief: The dispute concerned the limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief (Unterlassungsansprüche). The court determined that the case possesses fundamental significance, as it requires the higher court to further develop the legal doctrine regarding the statute of limitations applicable to such claims under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, and ordered the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute for the subsequent appellate proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délais doctrine juridique base de calcul procédure de révision action en interdiction réclamation administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) in the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
2 C 20/19
Statutory limitation of compensation claims for EU-law-violating overtime in public service
2 B 15/21
Limitation of Public-Law Usage Fee Claims: Application of the Three-Year Civil Law Period and Rejection of the "Behaved Claim" Doctrine in Administrative Assessment
10 B 6/18
Statutory limitation suspension by a determination order in the context of public law recovery claims under § 53 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwVfG
3 B 27/10
Reclamation of Lastenausgleich: Limitation period start upon statutory lifting of state administration and agency knowledge of damages compensation
2 B 18/21
Limitation of public-law usage fee claims: application of civil law statute of limitations to ancillary activity compensation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) in the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Verjährung öffentlich-rechtlicher Unterlassungsansprüche

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Rechtsprechung zur Verjährung öffentlich-rechtlicher Unterlassungsansprüche fortzuentwickeln.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwertes für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.