Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 BN 3/17, 9 BN 3/17 (9 CN 1/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:130918B9BN3.17.0 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional limits on cost coverage in fee collection

Numéro de cause 9 BN 3/17, 9 BN 3/17 (9 CN 1/18)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, rejecting the applicant's non-acceptance complaint and ordering that the constitutional limits on cost coverage in connection with the levying of fees be reviewed by the revision instance. The dispute concerned the permissibility of charging fees that exceed the actual administrative costs incurred (cost coverage), with the applicant challenging the lawfulness of such an excess. The court authorized the revision based on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the fundamental significance of the question regarding whether cost coverage in fee collection infringes upon constitutional boundaries.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Constitutional limits on cost coverage in fee collection: The dispute concerned the permissibility of charging fees that exceed the actual administrative costs incurred (cost coverage), with the applicant challenging the lawfulness of such an excess. The court authorized the revision based on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the fundamental significance of the question regarding whether cost coverage in fee collection infringes upon constitutional boundaries.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
limites constitutionnelles émolument administratif litige non administratif révision de la constitution taxe de raccordement recours constitutionnel à l'étranger

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 2226/20
Constitutional complaint: Admissibility of judicial subject value determination and reimbursement of expenses following non-acceptance
2 BvR 1216/21
Denial of constitutional complaint cost reimbursement where administrative remedy followed legislative amendment rather than recognition of constitutional right
2 BvR 586/19
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint expenses denied due to administrative modification based on changed circumstances and lack of exhaustion of legal remedies
1 BvR 1012/11
Refusal to allow appeal for divergent jurisprudence on recoverability of debt collection agency fees as default damages
1 BvR 160/15
Unreviewability of abuse fee imposition and non-acceptance rulings in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Kostenüberdeckung bei Gebührenerhebung

[GRUENDE]

Die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, inwieweit eine Kostenüberdeckung im Zusammenhang mit der Gebührenerhebung an verfassungsrechtliche Grenzen stößt.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG.