Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 B 2/18, 2 B 2/18 (2 C 5/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:260418B2B2.18.0 Généré par l'IA

Disciplinary sanctioning of off-duty possession of child pornography by a teacher

Numéro de cause 2 B 2/18, 2 B 2/18 (2 C 5/18)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave for a revision appeal in a disciplinary law case, finding the plaintiff's complaint well-founded and allowing the higher court to address issues of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerns the appropriate disciplinary sanction for a teacher found to be in possession of child pornography in a non-service capacity, specifically how such an off-duty misconduct must be weighed against the teacher's other non-service behavior to determine the degree of culpability. The decision is grounded in the interplay of disciplinary liability standards and appellate review criteria, citing § 41 DiszG BE in conjunction with § 69 BDG and § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO to establish that the revision proceedings are suitable for further clarification of this legal question.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 41 DiszG BE i.V.m. § 69 BDG und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Disciplinary sanctioning of off-duty possession of child pornography by a teacher: The dispute concerns the appropriate disciplinary sanction for a teacher found to be in possession of child pornography in a non-service capacity, specifically how such an off-duty misconduct must be weighed against the teacher's other non-service behavior to determine the degree of culpability. The decision is grounded in the interplay of disciplinary liability standards and appellate review criteria, citing § 41 DiszG BE in conjunction with § 69 BDG and § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO to establish that the revision proceedings are suitable for further clarification of this legal question.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
possession de pornographie enfantine droit disciplinaire sanction administrative réclamation administrative motifs de révision contravention de peu d'importance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
§ 69 BDG und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.
§ 41 DiszG BE i.V.m. § 69 BDG und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
Généré par l'IA
2 C 4/18
Off-duty possession of child pornography by a teacher: disciplinary removal despite criminal fine
2 C 5/10
Disciplinary liability for teacher's off-duty possession of child pornography and determination of appropriate disciplinary measure based on offense-specific weighting
2 C 3/18
Teacher's off-duty possession of child pornography: Trustworthiness requirement and irrelevance of criminal monetary penalty for disciplinary dismissal
2 B 25/23
Off-duty possession of child pornography by a teacher: presumptive loss of trust and dismissal despite statutory limits on criminal record use
2 B 42/16
Disciplinary dismissal of teacher for massive possession of child pornography; service nexus and special reprehensibility justifying maximum penalty

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 41 DiszG BE i.V.m. § 69 BDG und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Zulassung der Revision; disziplinare Ahndung des Besitzes kinderpornographischer Schriften bei Lehrern

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 41 DiszG BE i.V.m. § 69 BDG und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beizutragen, wie bei Lehrern das außerdienstliche Dienstvergehen des Besitzes von kinderpornographischen Schriften unter Berücksichtigung des sonstigen außerdienstlichen Verhaltens des Lehrers disziplinarrechtlich zu ahnden ist.