Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 PB 14/16, 5 PB 14/16 (5 P 6/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:070617B5PB14.16.0 Généré par l'IA

Right of a staff representative body to information on the initial assignment of civil servants' experience levels under personnel representation law

Numéro de cause 5 PB 14/16, 5 PB 14/16 (5 P 6/17)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal on points of law to determine a question of fundamental significance regarding the information rights of a staff representative body. The dispute concerns whether a staff representative is entitled to information under § 69(2) in conjunction with § 69(1) No. 2 of the Law on Personnel Representation for the Federal Civil Service in Rhineland-Palatinate (LPersVG RP) about the initial assignment of experience levels to civil servants upon appointment, including which assignments were made and the considerations guiding the agency, pursuant to §§ 29 and 30 of the Rhineland-Palatinate Law on the Service of Civil Servants (LBesG RP). The court ordered that the appeal be permitted to allow the appellate panel to clarify this specific legal issue, with no final substantive ruling on the merits issued at this stage.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG, § 121 Abs. 2 LPersVG RP, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG; Right of a staff representative body to information on the initial assignment of civil servants' experience levels under personnel representation law: The dispute concerns whether a staff representative is entitled to information under § 69(2) in conjunction with § 69(1) No. 2 of the Law on Personnel Representation for the Federal Civil Service in Rhineland-Palatinate (LPersVG RP) about the initial assignment of experience levels to civil servants upon appointment, including which assignments were made and the considerations guiding the agency, pursuant to §§ 29 and 30 of the Rhineland-Palatinate Law on the Service of Civil Servants (LBesG RP). The court ordered that the appeal be permitted to allow the appellate panel to clarify this specific legal issue, with no final substantive ruling on the merits issued at this stage.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droits du fonctionnaire profession administrative désignation d'un représentant représentation légale droits fondamentaux notation des représentants du personnel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
Legal ground justifying the admission due to a question of fundamental significance.
§ 121 Abs. 2 LPersVG RP
Primary basis for admitting the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde).
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
Procedural requirement cited in conjunction with the admission of the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
5 P 6/17
General supervisory information rights of the staff council regarding the initial determination of civil servants' experience levels despite the absence of co-determination
5 P 13/14
Co-determination of civil servants' initial experience level classification under the Federal Personnel Representation Act
5 P 11/19
Scope of works council's information and document submission rights for senior civil servant appointments under § 77 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Alt. 2 BPersVG
6 PB 8/13
No comprehensive duty to inform the personnel council: strict task-accessory scope of information rights in German personnel representation law
5 PB 6.25, 5 PB 6.25 (5 P 2.26)
Staff Council's right to information on named employees' pay groups and job classifications

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 121 Abs. 2 LPersVG RP

Primary basis for admitting the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde).

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural requirement cited in conjunction with the admission of the appeal.

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

Legal ground justifying the admission due to a question of fundamental significance.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Informationsrecht bei Erstfestsetzung der Erfahrungsstufe

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 121 Abs. 2 LPersVG RP i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob die Personalvertretung im Zusammenhang mit der Einstellung von Beamtinnen und Beamten erfolgenden Erstfestsetzung von Erfahrungsstufen (§§ 29, 30 LBesG RP) einen Informationsanspruch gemäß § 69 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Abs. 1 Nr. 2 LPersVG RP darüber hat, welche Stufenfestsetzungen vorgenommen worden sind und von welchen Erwägungen sich die Dienststelle dabei hat leiten lassen.