Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
7 B 12/16, 7 B 12/16 (7 C 8/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:070217B7B12.16.0 Généré par l'IA

Admission of revision: Clarification of "professional activity" in environmental damage liability

Numéro de cause 7 B 12/16, 7 B 12/16 (7 C 8/17)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complainants' objections and ordered that the revision appeals be admissible for the case. The dispute concerned the interpretation of the term "professional activity" within the framework of environmental damage liability, specifically in the context of a prior lower-instance decision. The court determined that the case would contribute to clarifying this undefined legal concept and set the tentative amount in dispute for the revision proceedings. The decisive legal basis included § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO for the admission of the revision, and §§ 47 Abs. 1, 52 Abs. 1, and 63 Abs. 1 GKG for the determination of the court fees and amount in dispute.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Admission of revision: Clarification of "professional activity" in environmental damage liability: The dispute concerned the interpretation of the term "professional activity" within the framework of environmental damage liability, specifically in the context of a prior lower-instance decision. The court determined that the case would contribute to clarifying this undefined legal concept and set the tentative amount in dispute for the revision proceedings. The decisive legal basis included § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO for the admission of the revision, and §§ 47 Abs. 1, 52 Abs. 1, and 63 Abs. 1 GKG for the determination of the court fees and amount in dispute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
responsabilité des dommages environnementaux procédure de révision décision préjudicielle honoraires d'avocat décision-cadre action en indemnité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for the order admitting the revision appeals to the Federal Administrative Court.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision authorizing the court to set the amount in dispute preliminarily.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule governing the calculation of the amount in dispute.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for the order admitting the revision appeals to the Federal Administrative Court.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule governing the calculation of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision authorizing the court to set the amount in dispute preliminarily.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Begriff der beruflichen Tätigkeit

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässigen Beschwerden sind begründet. Die Revisionen sind gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung des Begriffs der beruflichen Tätigkeit im Sinne des § 2 Nr. 4 des Umweltschadensgesetzes beitragen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.