Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B43.16.0 Généré par l'IA

Admission of revision on entitlement to foreign-seated business participations under German restitution law

Numéro de cause 8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint and ordered the admission of an appeal on points of law, effectively allowing the case to proceed to the Revision bench. The dispute concerned a property restitution claim under the German Restitution and Compensation Act (VermG), specifically challenging the lower court's treatment of eligibility for participation interests in companies that were situated outside the accession territory at the time of the expropriation or seizure. The court found the appeal admissible due to the matter's fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on whether § 1 Abs. 6 and § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG permit the determination of entitlement to business participations for entities with a foreign seat during the relevant period.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Admission of revision on entitlement to foreign-seated business participations under German restitution law: The dispute concerned a property restitution claim under the German Restitution and Compensation Act (VermG), specifically challenging the lower court's treatment of eligibility for participation interests in companies that were situated outside the accession territory at the time of the expropriation or seizure. The court found the appeal admissible due to the matter's fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on whether § 1 Abs. 6 and § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG permit the determination of entitlement to business participations for entities with a foreign seat during the relevant period.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
restitution de la propriété droit étranger révision d'une décision droit à l'indemnisation société étrangère objet du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as it explicitly justifies the admission of the revision due to fundamental significance in the operative part of the decision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
8 B 44/16, 8 B 44/16 (8 C 5/17)
Admission of revision on whether restitution entitlements under the VermG cover companies located outside the former GDR at the time of damage
8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17)
Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law
8 B 33/16, 8 B 33/16 (8 C 1/17)
Eligibility for fractional restitution of foreign-listed shares under the Act on the Removal of the Consequences of National Socialist Persecution
8 B 105/09
Restitution eligibility for corporate shareholders under German asset restitution law
8 B 65/13
Restitution of expropriated land and admissibility requirements for complaint against non-admission of revision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as it explicitly justifies the admission of the revision due to fundamental significance in the operative part of the decision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.