Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
3 B 65/15, 3 B 65/15 (3 C 18/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:060716B3B65.15.0 Généré par l'IA

Standing to challenge ship traffic authorization: subjective property rights under Art. 14 GG versus state navigability declarations

Numéro de cause 3 B 65/15, 3 B 65/15 (3 C 18/16)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed an appeal to it, granting the complainant's motion and establishing that the case is of fundamental importance for determining standing to challenge the authorization of general ship traffic on a waterway. The dispute concerned the lander-legal declaration of navigability and the resulting permission for general vessel passage, with the core issue being whether such authorization infringes upon the property rights of an owner of land in or adjacent to the waterway. The decisive legal basis involved § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the admission of the appeal on grounds of fundamental significance, and the court focused on whether subjective rights derivable from Article 14(1) of the German Basic Law or other federal law exist independently of any third-party protection conferred by state navigability regulations, thereby establishing the plaintiff's standing to sue.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, Art. 14 Abs. 1 GG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG; Standing to challenge ship traffic authorization: subjective property rights under Art. 14 GG versus state navigability declarations: The dispute concerned the lander-legal declaration of navigability and the resulting permission for general vessel passage, with the core issue being whether such authorization infringes upon the property rights of an owner of land in or adjacent to the waterway. The decisive legal basis involved § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the admission of the appeal on grounds of fundamental significance, and the court focused on whether subjective rights derivable from Article 14(1) of the German Basic Law or other federal law exist independently of any third-party protection conferred by state navigability regulations, thereby establishing the plaintiff's standing to sue.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
qualité pour recourir droit à la propriété autorisation de procéder droit subjectif recours contre des décisions administratives liberté de navigation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The main legal ground cited in the dispositive to justify the allowance of the appeal based on the case's fundamental legal significance.
Art. 14 Abs. 1 GG
Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, zu der Frage Stellung zu nehmen, inwieweit sich unabhängig davon, ob sich die landesrechtliche Regelung über eine Schiffbarkeitserklärung von Gewässern selbst Drittschutz beilegt, aus Art. 14 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive for the determination of the provisional amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive for the determination of the provisional amount in dispute.
Généré par l'IA
3 C 18/16
Standing of waterway property owner to challenge general navigability declaration despite non-ownership of flowing water
7 B 3/18
Standing to challenge offshore gas pipeline authorization: exclusion of speculative future port development impairments under German and EU law
VI ZR 403/14
Inland waterway shipping: Constitutiveness of one-day vessel immobilization as property tort under § 823(1) BGB
3 BN 1/23
Strategic environmental assessment requirement for regional navigation ordinances and validity of licensing regimes for private water bodies
4 BN 28/23
Norm Control Standing: Property Owner's Entitlement to Challenge Development Plan Under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO and Art. 14 GG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The main legal ground cited in the dispositive to justify the allowance of the appeal based on the case's fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive for the determination of the provisional amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive for the determination of the provisional amount in dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Zulassung von allgemeinen Schiffsverkehr

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, zu der Frage Stellung zu nehmen, inwieweit sich unabhängig davon, ob sich die landesrechtliche Regelung über eine Schiffbarkeitserklärung von Gewässern selbst Drittschutz beilegt, aus Art. 14 Abs. 1 GG oder sonstigem Bundesrecht subjektive Rechte eines Eigentümers von Flächen in oder an diesem Gewässer ergeben können, die seine Klagebefugnis gegen die Zulassung des allgemeinen Schiffsverkehrs auf diesem Gewässer begründen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.