Compliance of an irregular evaluation system for permanent judges with constitutional personnel standards
Allemagne (DE)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal for the plaintiff, ordering that the appeal is admissible due to the matter's fundamental significance, leaving the lower instance judgment pending final review on the merits. The dispute involves a civil servant (a judge) challenging an evaluation system that systematically omits regular performance appraisals in favor of irregular, case-specific evaluations with individually determined time frames, effectively questioning whether such a system complies with constitutional guarantees for personnel advancement. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO regarding admissibility based on fundamental legal questions, specifically examining whether the described evaluation structure satisfies the requirements of Article 33 Abs. 2 of the German Basic Law concerning the right of officials to be treated according to their aptitude, performance, and professional seniority.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IA§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, Art. 33 Abs. 2 GG; Compliance of an irregular evaluation system for permanent judges with constitutional personnel standards: The dispute involves a civil servant (a judge) challenging an evaluation system that systematically omits regular performance appraisals in favor of irregular, case-specific evaluations with individually determined time frames, effectively questioning whether such a system complies with constitutional guarantees for personnel advancement. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO regarding admissibility based on fundamental legal questions, specifically examining whether the described evaluation structure satisfies the requirements of Article 33 Abs. 2 of the German Basic Law concerning the right of officials to be treated according to their aptitude, performance, and professional seniority.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAGround for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Texte complet
Revisionszulassung; Beurteilungssystem ohne Regelbeurteilung
[GRUENDE]
Die Revision der Klägerin ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen.
Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein Beurteilungssystem, das für auf Lebenszeit ernannte Richter im Grundsatz auf Regelbeurteilungen verzichtet und lediglich Anlassbeurteilungen mit abhängig vom Einzelfall begrenzten Beurteilungszeiträumen vorsieht, den Anforderungen des Art. 33 Abs. 2 GG genügt.