Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 BN 5/15, 4 BN 5/15 (4 CN 4/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:081015B4BN5.15.0 Généré par l'IA

Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO for objections based on facts arising after public display of a zoning plan

Numéro de cause 4 BN 5/15, 4 BN 5/15 (4 CN 4/15)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted permission for an appeal on points of law, allowing the plaintiff's complaint to proceed to the revision stage for substantive review. The case involves a norm control action challenging a zoning plan (Bebauungsplan), centered on whether a claimant who made no objections during the public display period is precluded from raising new legal grounds under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO when those grounds are based on factual circumstances that arose chronologically after the plan's public display. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits an appeal if the case has general legal significance, specifically to clarify the conditions under which such temporal preclusion applies in administrative norm control proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 47 Abs. 2 VwGO, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO for objections based on facts arising after public display of a zoning plan: The case involves a norm control action challenging a zoning plan (Bebauungsplan), centered on whether a claimant who made no objections during the public display period is precluded from raising new legal grounds under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO when those grounds are based on factual circumstances that arose chronologically after the plan's public display. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits an appeal if the case has general legal significance, specifically to clarify the conditions under which such temporal preclusion applies in administrative norm control proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révision du plan d'affectation motifs de révision exceptions de procédure réclamation administrative qualité pour recourir contre permis non-classement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 47 Abs. 2 VwGO
Revisionszulassung; Präklusion nach § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO bei nach Auslegung eintretenden Sachverhalten
§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint in conjunction with § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for the verdict by justifying the grant of permission for the appeal on points of law due to the general significance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 132 Abs. 1 VwGO
Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint challenging the non-acceptance of the appeal.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
Généré par l'IA
4 CN 1/13
Preclusion of zoning plan review under § 47(2a) VwGO for failure to object during repeated public consultations.
4 CN 2/15
Normenkontrollantrag: Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO for objections attributed to a different legal entity
4 CN 3/10
Preclusion of objections in norm control under § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO for self-evident interests not raised during public consultation
4 BN 20/19, 4 BN 20/19 (4 CN 3/19)
Norm control admissibility of zoning plan objections filed before statutory repeal of § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO
4 CN 3/09
Inadmissibility of zoning plan challenge under § 47(2a) VwGO after supplementary public display during pending litigation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for the verdict by justifying the grant of permission for the appeal on points of law due to the general significance of the legal issue.

§ 132 Abs. 1 VwGO

Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint challenging the non-acceptance of the appeal.

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint in conjunction with § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Präklusion nach § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO bei nach Auslegung eintretenden Sachverhalten

[GRUENDE]

Die gemäß § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen weiteren Voraussetzungen ein Antragsteller, der während der öffentlichen Auslegung eines Bebauungsplans keine Einwendungen geltend gemacht hat, im Normenkontrollverfahren gegen einen Bebauungsplan nach § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO präkludiert ist, wenn er rechtliche Bedenken gegen den Plan geltend macht, die an Sachverhalte anknüpfen, die der Auslegung des Bebauungsplans zeitlich nachfolgen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.