Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
6 B 5/15, 6 B 5/15 (6 C 24/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:110815B6B5.15.0 Généré par l'IA

Telecommunications tariff authorization: contractual prerequisite for private-law effects under § 37(2) TKG

Numéro de cause 6 B 5/15, 6 B 5/15 (6 C 24/15)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the appeal against the lower court's refusal to admit the revision, finding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance; consequently, the plaintiff prevailed on the procedural motion, and the case was referred for full merits review on appeal. The dispute concerned a telecommunications regulatory matter, specifically whether an authorization for tariff rates under § 37(2) of the Telecommunications Act requires a specific contractual claim as a prerequisite for its effect in shaping private legal relationships. The decisive legal basis for the decision was § 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which governs the admission of revisions based on fundamental legal significance, alongside §§ 47, 52, and 63 of the Court Costs Act (GKG) for the determination of the value in dispute.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Telecommunications tariff authorization: contractual prerequisite for private-law effects under § 37(2) TKG: The dispute concerned a telecommunications regulatory matter, specifically whether an authorization for tariff rates under § 37(2) of the Telecommunications Act requires a specific contractual claim as a prerequisite for its effect in shaping private legal relationships. The decisive legal basis for the decision was § 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which governs the admission of revisions based on fundamental legal significance, alongside §§ 47, 52, and 63 of the Court Costs Act (GKG) for the determination of the value in dispute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
litige en matière de tarif motifs de révision acte de procédure frais administratifs contrat commercial droit de préemption légal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the appeal against the refusal to admit the revision due to fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied to determine the value in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied to fix the preliminary value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Procedural rule applied to fix the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
6 C 24/15
Scope of privatrechtsgestaltende Wirkung of telecommunication fee approval under § 37(2) TKG
6 B 53/12, 6 B 53/12 (6 C 10/13)
Dependency of final telecommunications fee authorization on prior consultation and consolidation proceedings
6 B 164/18
Binding effect of prior substantive rejection of telecommunications tariff orders under § 25 TKG and § 43 VwVfG
6 B 27/20
Validity of Telecom Fee Approval: Flawed Discretion in Selecting Between Market Benchmarking and Cost Models Under § 35 TKG
6 B 30/15
Telecommunications tariff approval: validity of retroactive one-time fees under repealed TKG 1996 and TEntgV and organizational cost-efficiency standards

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the appeal against the refusal to admit the revision due to fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Procedural rule applied to fix the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied to determine the value in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied to fix the preliminary value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung, telekommunikationsrechtliche Entgeltgenehmigung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob die privatrechtsgestaltende Wirkung einer Entgeltgenehmigung nach § 37 Abs. 2 TKG eine vertragliche Anspruchsgrundlage für die Entgeltzahlung voraussetzt.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.