Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
IX B 119/13 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of non-admission complaint based solely on general attacks against the substantive correctness of the lower tax court's decision

Numéro de cause IX B 119/13
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Court of Finance (BFH) dismissed the non-admission complaint as inadmissible, thereby upholding the lower tax court's judgment and denying the taxpayer's request for admission to revision. The dispute concerned a challenge to the materially correct application of tax law, where the taxpayer argued against the merits of the financial court's decision without identifying specific procedural errors. Relying on Sections 116(3) sentence 3 and 115(2) numbers 1, 2, and 3 of the Fiscal Courts Act (FGO), the court held that general attacks on the substantive correctness of a lower instance decision are insufficient to justify a revision; the complaint must substantiate a specific ground for admission as defined by the statute. Additionally, the court noted the absence of a coherent application for a correction of the judgment pursuant to Section 107 FGO.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 116 Abs. 3 Satz 3 FGO, § 115 Abs. 2 Nrn. 1, 2, 3 FGO, § 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 2. Halbsatz FGO, § 107 FGO; Admissibility of non-admission complaint based solely on general attacks against the substantive correctness of the lower tax court's decision: The dispute concerned a challenge to the materially correct application of tax law, where the taxpayer argued against the merits of the financial court's decision without identifying specific procedural errors. Relying on Sections 116(3) sentence 3 and 115(2) numbers 1, 2, and 3 of the Fiscal Courts Act (FGO), the court held that general attacks on the substantive correctness of a lower instance decision are insufficient to justify a revision; the complaint must substantiate a specific ground for admission as defined by the statute. Additionally, the court noted the absence of a coherent application for a correction of the judgment pursuant to Section 107 FGO.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit fiscal erreur matérielle corrections financières révision d'une décision procès fiscal décisions incidentes

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 116 Abs. 3 Satz 3 FGO
Cited in the dispositive order to establish the requirement for a substantiated complaint that was not met, rendering the appeal inadmissible.
§ 115 Abs. 2 Nrn. 1, 2, 3 FGO
Cited in the dispositive order to define the specific grounds for admission to revision that the taxpayer failed to substantiate.
§ 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 2. Halbsatz FGO
Cited in the dispositive order as the procedural basis for waiving a further detailed justification for the decision.
§ 107 FGO
Cited in the dispositive order to note the absence of a coherent application for correction of the judgment.
Généré par l'IA
IX B 131/13
Non-Admission Complaint: Inadmissibility of Challenging Substantive Law as Procedural Error Under § 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 FGO
IX B 86/17
Admissibility of non-admission complaint requiring specific factual substantiation of procedural defects in tax litigation
I B 92, 93/09, I B 92/09, I B 93/09
Admissibility of non-admission complaint for failure to argue fundamental significance of procedural validity of amended credit tax assessment
IV B 97/11
Non-admission complaint inadmissible due to failure to substantiate procedural error and fundamental significance for expired law under § 7g EStG a.F.
III B 136/14
Non-admission complaint inadmissible due to ambiguous identification of the appealed tax court judgment within the statutory deadline

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 116 Abs. 3 Satz 3 FGO

Cited in the dispositive order to establish the requirement for a substantiated complaint that was not met, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

§ 115 Abs. 2 Nrn. 1, 2, 3 FGO

Cited in the dispositive order to define the specific grounds for admission to revision that the taxpayer failed to substantiate.

§ 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 2. Halbsatz FGO

Cited in the dispositive order as the procedural basis for waiving a further detailed justification for the decision.

§ 107 FGO

Cited in the dispositive order to note the absence of a coherent application for correction of the judgment.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde

[LEITSATZ]

NV: Allgemeine Angriffe gegen die materiell-rechtliche Richtigkeit der finanzgerichtlichen Entscheidung können die Revisionszulassung nicht rechtfertigen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist unzulässig. Der Kläger und Beschwerdeführer macht nicht in der gebotenen substantiierten Weise (§ 116 Abs. 3 Satz 3 der Finanzgerichtsordnung --FGO--) einen Revisionszulassungsgrund i.S. von § 115 Abs. 2 Nrn. 1, 2, 3 FGO geltend. Vielmehr wendet sich die Beschwerde allgemein gegen die materiell-rechtliche Richtigkeit des finanzgerichtlichen Urteils. Dies kann jedoch die Revisionszulassung nicht rechtfertigen. Von einer weiteren Begründung wird gemäß § 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 2. Halbsatz FGO abgesehen.

Ergänzend wird darauf hingewiesen, dass dem Senat ein schlüssiger Antrag auf Urteilsberichtigung i.S. von § 107 FGO nicht vorliegt.