Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvQ 47/26 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2026:qs20260709.2bvq004726 Généré par l'IA

Interim relief against GKV contribution rate stabilization legislation: rejection of urgent constitutional complaint

Numéro de cause 2 BvQ 47/26
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate) rejected the applicant’s application for interim relief, upholding the legislative process without issuing an injunction. The dispute concerned a challenge to the legislative procedure for the GKV Contribution Rate Stabilization Act, with the applicant seeking to suspend or halt the enactment or implementation of the statute pending a final constitutional review. In its preliminary notification, the Court denied the urgent request for an interim order under the applicable provisions of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, determining that the applicant failed to demonstrate the requisite danger of serious disadvantage or that the balance of interests favored immediate injunctive relief. The decision constitutes a procedural dismissal of the urgent application, leaving the challenged legislation in force, with the full written justification to be transmitted separately in accordance with statutory requirements.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz; Interim relief against GKV contribution rate stabilization legislation: rejection of urgent constitutional complaint: The dispute concerned a challenge to the legislative procedure for the GKV Contribution Rate Stabilization Act, with the applicant seeking to suspend or halt the enactment or implementation of the statute pending a final constitutional review. In its preliminary notification, the Court denied the urgent request for an interim order under the applicable provisions of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, determining that the applicant failed to demonstrate the requisite danger of serious disadvantage or that the balance of interests favored immediate injunctive relief. The decision constitutes a procedural dismissal of the urgent application, leaving the challenged legislation in force, with the full written justification to be transmitted separately in accordance with statutory requirements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé décision préjudicielle exigence constitutionnelle licenciement avec effet immédiat taux d'intérêt questions procédurales

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to mandate the separate transmission of the written justification for the decision.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1672/19
Interim relief in constitutional complaints: rejection due to insufficient substantiation of severe disadvantages and urgency.
2 BvR 87/17
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint due to insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights violations and failure to engage with the challenged judgment
2 BvR 1349/16
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint and mootness of interim relief request
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint
2 BvE 4/26
German statutory health insurance contribution rate legislation: Unsuccessful interim relief in constitutional inter-institutional dispute over legislative procedure

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to mandate the separate transmission of the written justification for the decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgloser isolierter Eilantrag bzgl des Gesetzgebungsverfahrens zum GKV-Beitragssatzstabilisierungsgesetz - Vorabmitteilung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG, Begründung wird nachgereicht

[TENOR]

1. Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

2. Die Begründung der Entscheidung wird den Beteiligten gemäß § 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz gesondert übermittelt.