Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 1295/22 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2025:rk20250917.1bvr129522 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of constitutional complaint against unreasoned chamber decision under § 93d BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 1295/22
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without granting it admission for decision and without providing a reasoned explanation, rendering the ruling final and non-appealable. The specific subject matter of the dispute and the material facts underlying the challenge are not disclosed in the provided text, which consists solely of the procedural order and a standard note on unenforceability. The operative legal basis for the dismissal is § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, which permits the court to forgo a reasoned justification when rejecting a constitutional complaint, thereby leaving the prior judicial determination in force.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Admissibility of constitutional complaint against unreasoned chamber decision under § 93d BVerfGG: The specific subject matter of the dispute and the material facts underlying the challenge are not disclosed in the provided text, which consists solely of the procedural order and a standard note on unenforceability. The operative legal basis for the dismissal is § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, which permits the court to forgo a reasoned justification when rejecting a constitutional complaint, thereby leaving the prior judicial determination in force.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
objet du litige motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels règles procédurales droit judiciaire décision motivée droit d'être entendu

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 1607/13
Constitutional complaint over unreasoned non-acceptance; scope of mandatory reasoning duties for Chamber decisions
1 BvR 367/14
Unreasoned non-acceptance of constitutional complaint under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 188/22
Constitutional complaint against prior judicial decision; omission of reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 1819/11
Constitutional complaint rejected without reasoned chamber decision under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 1332/16
Constitutional complaint against unreasoned non-acceptance; reliance on § 93d BVerfGG to dispense with written justification

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.