Constitutional complaint over unreasoned non-acceptance under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without a reasoned opinion, leaving the underlying decision in force. The dispute concerned a challenge to a prior judicial ruling, filed as a constitutional complaint under the jurisdiction of the First Senate, First Chamber. The court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to decline to accept the case for decision and waived the requirement to provide a written justification, rendering the non-acceptance decision final and unappealable.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint over unreasoned non-acceptance under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a challenge to a prior judicial ruling, filed as a constitutional complaint under the jurisdiction of the First Senate, First Chamber. The court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to decline to accept the case for decision and waived the requirement to provide a written justification, rendering the non-acceptance decision final and unappealable.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAProcedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify omitting the reasoned decision for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Texte complet
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung
[TENOR]
1. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
2. Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.