Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvC 9/23 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:cs20230920.2bvc000923 Généré par l'IA

Election validity challenge dismissed by reference to rapporteur's letter under § 24 BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 2 BvC 9/23
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a complaint challenging election results without further oral proceedings, meaning the challenged election stands as valid and the complainant did not prevail. The case involved a petition (*Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde*) filed under the court's mandate to review the validity of elections to the Bundestag, where the complaint failed on the merits. The court rejected the complaint by reference to the reasons set out in the rapporteur’s letter of July 20, 2023, and explicitly dispensed with an extended written opinion pursuant to § 24 sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), indicating that the legal deficiencies of the challenge were sufficiently established in the preliminary written exchange.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Election validity challenge dismissed by reference to rapporteur's letter under § 24 BVerfGG: The case involved a petition (*Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde*) filed under the court's mandate to review the validity of elections to the Bundestag, where the complaint failed on the merits. The court rejected the complaint by reference to the reasons set out in the rapporteur’s letter of July 20, 2023, and explicitly dispensed with an extended written opinion pursuant to § 24 sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), indicating that the legal deficiencies of the challenge were sufficiently established in the preliminary written exchange.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du scrutin expertise juridique procédure orale recours constitutionnel à l'étranger réputation de retrait d'opposition élection européenne

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied to dispense with an extended written reasoning in the dispositive by reference to the rapporteur's letter.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvC 18/25
Election validity challenge; sufficiency of reference to Rapporteur's letter under § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG to omit further written justification
2 BvC 11/18
Challenge to election validity dismissed under § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG due to lack of merit per Rapporteur's letter.
2 BvC 7/23
Dismissal of election review complaint based on rapporteur's letter under § 24 BVerfGG
2 BvC 29/18
Election validity challenge rejected under § 24 BVerfGG without substantive reasoning
2 BvC 48/23
Election review complaint; adequacy of rapporteur's letter as basis for denying further justification under § 24 BVerfGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied to dispense with an extended written reasoning in the dispositive by reference to the rapporteur's letter.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde unter Hinweis auf das Berichterstatterschreiben

[TENOR]

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.

[GRUENDE]

Der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleibt aus den in dem Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 20. Juli 2023 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.