Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 1260/23 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rk20230905.2bvr126023 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint against civil hearing conducted via video conference under § 128a ZPO: failure to substantiate fundamental rights infringement

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 1260/23
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the request for an interim injunction, leaving the lower court proceedings unaffected. The dispute arose in constitutional complaint proceedings where the complainant challenged a civil court order to hold the hearing via video and audio conference under § 128a of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), alleging a violation of fundamental rights. The Court rejected the application because the complainant failed to substantively demonstrate a plausible infringement of basic rights specifically attributable to the conduct of the hearing through remote transmission, thereby failing to meet the threshold requirements for granting interim relief in this procedural context.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 128a ZPO; Constitutional complaint against civil hearing conducted via video conference under § 128a ZPO: failure to substantiate fundamental rights infringement: The dispute arose in constitutional complaint proceedings where the complainant challenged a civil court order to hold the hearing via video and audio conference under § 128a of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), alleging a violation of fundamental rights. The Court rejected the application because the complainant failed to substantively demonstrate a plausible infringement of basic rights specifically attributable to the conduct of the hearing through remote transmission, thereby failing to meet the threshold requirements for granting interim relief in this procedural context.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit d'être entendu conduite du procès contestation civile exigence constitutionnelle procédure d'infraction droits fondamentaux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 128a ZPO
Erfolgloser Eilantrag im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Grundrechtsverletzung in Zusammenhang mit § 128a ZPO (Verhandlung im Wege der Bild- und Tonübertragung) bislang nicht nachvollziehbar dargelegt
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 1054/19
Constitutional complaint: denial of oral hearing under § 495a ZPO and failure to demonstrate causal link between right-to-be-heard violation and loss of declaratory interest
1 BvR 367/15
Mandatory oral hearing under § 495a ZPO upon party request and violation of constitutional right to be heard
2 BvR 1907/18
Constitutional right to be heard violated by ignoring statutory request for oral hearing in written proceedings under § 495a(2) ZPO
2 BvR 1552/14
Admissibility of constitutional complaint against civil cost order for failure to file hearing objection despite violation of right to be heard
1 BvR 2884/18
Failure to Notify Parties of Written Procedure Under § 495a ZPO Violates Right to Be Heard

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgloser Eilantrag im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Grundrechtsverletzung in Zusammenhang mit § 128a ZPO (Verhandlung im Wege der Bild- und Tonübertragung) bislang nicht nachvollziehbar dargelegt

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.