Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 3196/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rk20180619.1bvr319615 Généré par l'IA

Waiver of reasoning for non-acceptance of constitutional complaint under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 3196/15
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision and waived providing a written justification, rendering the ruling final and unchallengeable. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint regarding the validity or effect of a prior lower-court judgment, which thus remains in force as the unchallenged outcome. The Court applied § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the omission of reasoning in chamber decisions where the complaint does not meet the threshold for admissibility, thereby affirming the procedural bar without substantive review of the underlying legal issues.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Waiver of reasoning for non-acceptance of constitutional complaint under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint regarding the validity or effect of a prior lower-court judgment, which thus remains in force as the unchallenged outcome. The Court applied § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the omission of reasoning in chamber decisions where the complaint does not meet the threshold for admissibility, thereby affirming the procedural bar without substantive review of the underlying legal issues.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels bien-fondé matériel questions procédurales dispense de motivation constitution objet du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to waive the written justification for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1276/21
Waiver of written justification for non-acceptance of constitutional complaint under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 2831/17
Waiver of reasoning for non-admission of constitutional complaint under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 2207/15
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint without reasons pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 1332/16
Constitutional complaint against unreasoned non-acceptance; reliance on § 93d BVerfGG to dispense with written justification
1 BvR 2318/14
Constitutional complaint rejected due to non-acceptance without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to waive the written justification for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.