Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
2 BvC 63/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:cs20230201.2bvc006319 Généré par l'IA

Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde against European Parliament election results dismissed a-limine via § 24(2) BVerfGG without substantive review

Numéro de cause 2 BvC 63/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a challenge against European Parliament election results without further substantive review, thereby upholding the validity of the contested election and denying the applicant relief. The dispute concerned a specific German constituency where the applicant alleged irregularities or procedural errors in the vote-counting or ballot-handling process that were claimed to affect the outcome. Relying on the reasoning provided in the reporting judge’s preliminary letter of September 27, 2022, which found the complaint unfounded, the Court invoked § 26(3) Sentence 3 of the Act on the Election of Members of the European Parliament (EuWG) in conjunction with § 24 Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a detailed written justification for the rejection.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG; Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde against European Parliament election results dismissed a-limine via § 24(2) BVerfGG without substantive review: The dispute concerned a specific German constituency where the applicant alleged irregularities or procedural errors in the vote-counting or ballot-handling process that were claimed to affect the outcome. Relying on the reasoning provided in the reporting judge’s preliminary letter of September 27, 2022, which found the complaint unfounded, the Court invoked § 26(3) Sentence 3 of the Act on the Election of Members of the European Parliament (EuWG) in conjunction with § 24 Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a detailed written justification for the rejection.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
élection européenne validité du scrutin résultat du vote circonscription électorale erreur matérielle contrôle de la procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG

Cited in the grounds to justify the decision to dispense with further reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint, acting as the primary procedural basis for the a-limine rejection.

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the grounds as the specific procedural norm of the Federal Constitutional Court Act permitting the omission of a detailed written judgment under certain conditions.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde unter Hinweis auf das Berichterstatterschreiben

[TENOR]

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.

[GRUENDE]

Der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleibt aus den in dem Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 27. September 2022 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG, § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.