Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 2189/22 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rs20230125.2bvr218922 Généré par l'IA

Interim injunctive relief against state constitutional court judgment pending final constitutional review

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 2189/22
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's request for interim relief, leaving the judgment of the Berlin Constitutional Court of 16 November 2022 in force pending the separate transmission of the reasoned decision. The case involved a constitutional complaint filed against a decision by the Berlin Constitutional Court, where the applicant sought an emergency injunction to halt the effects of that state-level ruling. The Court denied the request based on the requirements for provisional measures under § 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, resulting in no immediate alteration to the status quo established by the lower court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Interim injunctive relief against state constitutional court judgment pending final constitutional review: The case involved a constitutional complaint filed against a decision by the Berlin Constitutional Court, where the applicant sought an emergency injunction to halt the effects of that state-level ruling. The Court denied the request based on the requirements for provisional measures under § 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, resulting in no immediate alteration to the status quo established by the lower court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé état d'urgence exigence constitutionnelle procédure préjudicielle d'urgence effets de l'arrêt recours constitutionnel à l'étranger

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to mandate the separate transmission of the reasoning for the decision.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvQ 61/19
Interim relief denied where pending constitutional complaint lacks exhausted remedies and substantive reasoning
2 BvR 671/26
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint
2 BvR 87/17
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint due to insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights violations and failure to engage with the challenged judgment
2 BvQ 55/20
Interim relief for enforcement protection proceedings dismissed for lack of substantiated constitutional merit against specific lower court decisions

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to mandate the separate transmission of the reasoning for the decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Ablehnung eines Eilantrags im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren gegen das Urteil des VerfGH Berlin vom 16.11.2022 (154/21 ua) - Vorabmitteilung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG, Begründung wird nachgereicht

[TENOR]

1. Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

2. Die Begründung der Entscheidung wird den Beteiligten gemäß § 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz gesondert übermittelt.