Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 515/20, 1 BvR 623/20, 1 BvR 972/20, 1 BvR 1290/20, 1 BvR 1450/20, 1 BvR 1648/20, 1 BvR 1891/20, 1 BvR 2046/20, 1 BvR 2111/20, 1 BvR 2737/20, 1 BvR 366/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220602.1bvr051520 Généré par l'IA

Valuation of constitutional complaints for attorney fees based on procedural significance and legal contribution

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 515/20, 1 BvR 623/20, 1 BvR 972/20, 1 BvR 1290/20, 1 BvR 1450/20, 1 BvR 1648/20, 1 BvR 1891/20, 1 BvR 2046/20, 1 BvR 2111/20, 1 BvR 2737/20, 1 BvR 366/21
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a consolidated administrative proceeding on June 2, 2022, the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (1st Chamber) fixed the monetary value of the subject matter for eleven separate constitutional complaint cases, determining that the applicants’ procedural interests justified the set fees for their legal representation. The dispute concerned the calculation of the *Gegenstandswert* (value in dispute) under the Fees Act for Constitutional Courts, where the Court assessed the subjective and objective significance of each constitutional complaint and the contribution of the respective counsel’s activity. Relying on the precedent established in BVerfGE 79, 365, the Court ordered that the values be set ranging from 7,500 euros to 4.8 million euros, with specific determinations for each case ID, thereby finalizing the basis for attorney fee calculations in these constitutional proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

BVerfGE 79, 365; Valuation of constitutional complaints for attorney fees based on procedural significance and legal contribution: The dispute concerned the calculation of the *Gegenstandswert* (value in dispute) under the Fees Act for Constitutional Courts, where the Court assessed the subjective and objective significance of each constitutional complaint and the contribution of the respective counsel’s activity. Relying on the precedent established in BVerfGE 79, 365, the Court ordered that the values be set ranging from 7,500 euros to 4.8 million euros, with specific determinations for each case ID, thereby finalizing the basis for attorney fee calculations in these constitutional proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
honoraires d'avocat procédure d'estimation objet du litige représentation légale calcul des frais contribution aux frais d'administration

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for determining the value of the subject matter based on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and the counsel's activity.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
BVerfGE 79, 365 ) werden die Werte des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wie folgt festgesetzt:
1 BvR 515/20
Interim relief against municipal rent cap law denied for lack of substantiated significant personal disadvantage
1 BvR 623/20
Constitutional complaint against Berlin Rent Cap Act: Interim relief denied for lack of demonstrated individual prejudice
1 BvR 972/20
Suspension of rent cap statute challenged as disproportionate interference with property rights
1 BvR 1891/20
Berlin Rent Cap Act: Loss of interest in constitutional complaints following prior declaration of unconstitutionality for lack of legislative competence
1 BvR 2737/20
Berlin Rent Cap Act: Loss of interest in constitutional complaints following prior declaration of unconstitutionality for lack of legislative competence
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1781/09
Gegenstandswert for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
1 BvR 256/08
Valuation of subject matter for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
1 BvR 795/21
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaints based on subjective and objective significance of proceedings
2 BvR 934/19
Valuation of the subject matter for attorney fee calculation in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 2258/09
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fee assessment in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for determining the value of the subject matter based on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and the counsel's activity.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Unter Berücksichtigung der subjektiven und objektiven Bedeutung der Verfahren und ihrer Förderung durch die jeweilige anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) werden die Werte des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wie folgt festgesetzt:

1 BvR 515/20 auf 18.000 Euro (in Worten: achtzehntausend Euro);

1 BvR 623/20 auf 30.000 Euro (in Worten: dreißigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 972/20 auf 45.000 Euro (in Worten: fünfundvierzigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 1891/20 auf 7.500 Euro (in Worten: siebentausendfünfhundert Euro);

1 BvR 2737/20 auf 35.000 Euro (in Worten: fünfunddreißigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 366/21 auf 45.000 Euro (in Worten: fünfundvierzigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 1290/20 auf 270.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertsiebzigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 1450/20 auf 340.000 Euro (in Worten: dreihundertvierzigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 1648/20 auf 530.000 Euro (in Worten fünfhundertdreißigtausend Euro);

1 BvR 2046/20 auf 4.800.000 Euro (in Worten: vier Millionen achthunderttausend Euro);

1 BvR 2111/20 auf 570.000 Euro (in Worten: fünfhundertsiebzigtausend Euro)