Waiver of written justification for non-acceptance of constitutional complaint under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Allemagne (DE)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe German Federal Constitutional Court’s First Senate, Second Chamber, issued an unreasoned order not to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby leaving the underlying judgment of the lower instance in force and rendering the complainant’s challenge ineffective. The dispute involved a constitutional complaint filed against a previous judicial ruling, though the specific subject matter and procedural history are not detailed in this summary order. The Court based its decision solely on procedural grounds, invoking § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to waive the mandatory requirement for providing a written justification, resulting in a final, unappealable non-acceptance decision.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Waiver of written justification for non-acceptance of constitutional complaint under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG: The dispute involved a constitutional complaint filed against a previous judicial ruling, though the specific subject matter and procedural history are not detailed in this summary order. The Court based its decision solely on procedural grounds, invoking § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to waive the mandatory requirement for providing a written justification, resulting in a final, unappealable non-acceptance decision.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAProcedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the waiver of a written reason for the decision.
Texte complet
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung
[TENOR]
1. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
2. Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.