Sufficiency of evidentiary showing for severe disadvantage in provisional injunction against mandatory testing, vaccination, or recovery in public transport
Allemagne (DE)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court rejected the request for a provisional injunction, leaving the challenged legislation in force and leaving the applicant without relief. The case concerned a constitutional law complaint challenging the mandatory 3G rule (vaccinated, recovered, or tested) imposed on passengers in public road, rail, and air transport under Section 28b(5), sentence 1, number 1 of the Infection Protection Act. The court determined that the application failed because the applicant did not sufficiently demonstrate a severe disadvantage within the meaning of Section 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, nor did they establish that a subsequent constitutional complaint would not be inadmissible or manifestly unfounded from the outset.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IA§ 32 BVerfGG; Sufficiency of evidentiary showing for severe disadvantage in provisional injunction against mandatory testing, vaccination, or recovery in public transport: The case concerned a constitutional law complaint challenging the mandatory 3G rule (vaccinated, recovered, or tested) imposed on passengers in public road, rail, and air transport under Section 28b(5), sentence 1, number 1 of the Infection Protection Act. The court determined that the application failed because the applicant did not sufficiently demonstrate a severe disadvantage within the meaning of Section 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, nor did they establish that a subsequent constitutional complaint would not be inadmissible or manifestly unfounded from the outset.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited in the dispositive as the criterion for the lack of a severe disadvantage, justifying the rejection of the request for a provisional injunction.
Texte complet
Erfolgloser Eilantrag gegen "3G-Pflicht" im öffentlichen Personennah- und -fernverkehr sowie im Luftverkehr (§ 28b Abs 5 S 1 Nr 1 IfSG idF vom 22.11.2021) - unzureichende Antragsbegründung - Tenorbegründung
[TENOR]
Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil weder ein schwerer Nachteil im Sinne des § 32 BVerfGG dargelegt ist noch, dass eine zu erhebende Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht von vornherein unzulässig oder offensichtlich unbegründet wäre.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.