Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
2 BvC 10/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:cs20210722.2bvc001021 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional non-recognition complaint: inadmissibility of interim relief and unreasoned pre-notification under § 96d BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 2 BvC 10/21
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the non-recognition complaint and declared the application for interim relief inadmissible, with the reasoning to be communicated separately. The case involved a non-recognition complaint filed under § 13 No. 3a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, challenging a lower court's denial of legal standing or recognition in a constitutional dispute, alongside a request for an interim order. The decisive legal basis comprised the Court's jurisdictional authority under Article 93(1) No. 4c of the Basic Law, its power to dismiss complaints without prior reasoning under § 96d Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the finding that the application for interim measures was procedurally inadmissible.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG; Constitutional non-recognition complaint: inadmissibility of interim relief and unreasoned pre-notification under § 96d BVerfGG: The case involved a non-recognition complaint filed under § 13 No. 3a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, challenging a lower court's denial of legal standing or recognition in a constitutional dispute, alongside a request for an interim order. The decisive legal basis comprised the Court's jurisdictional authority under Article 93(1) No. 4c of the Basic Law, its power to dismiss complaints without prior reasoning under § 96d Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the finding that the application for interim measures was procedurally inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels décisions incidentes reconnaissance d'État notification de la décision constitutionnalité des lois

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the communication of the decision without a written reasoning.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Zurückweisung einer Nichtanerkennungsbeschwerde (Art 93 Abs 1 Nr 4c GG, § 13 Nr 3a BVerfGG) - Vorabmitteilung der Entscheidung ohne Begründung (§ 96d S 2 BVerfGG) - Eilantrag unstatthaft

[TENOR]

Die Nichtanerkennungsbeschwerde wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung ist unstatthaft.

Die Begründung wird gesondert übermittelt (§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG).