Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvL 2/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:lk20210609.2bvl000221 Généré par l'IA

Mootness of constitutional reference to Berlin rent control law following declaration of federal legislative incompatibility

Numéro de cause 2 BvL 2/21
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the proceedings as moot because the subject matter was rendered obsolete by a subsequent, parallel decision. The case involved a reference under Article 100(1) of the German Basic Law, questioning the constitutionality of Berlin’s Rent Regulation Law regarding its alignment with federal legislative competences. The reference became moot after the Court’s Second Chamber, in a separate ruling, declared the same law incompatible with Article 74(1) No. 1 in conjunction with Article 72(1) of the Basic Law, rendering it null and void; this current decision is final and unappealable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG, § 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG, Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG; Mootness of constitutional reference to Berlin rent control law following declaration of federal legislative incompatibility: The case involved a reference under Article 100(1) of the German Basic Law, questioning the constitutionality of Berlin’s Rent Regulation Law regarding its alignment with federal legislative competences. The reference became moot after the Court’s Second Chamber, in a separate ruling, declared the same law incompatible with Article 74(1) No. 1 in conjunction with Article 72(1) of the Basic Law, rendering it null and void; this current decision is final and unappealable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
réglementation des loyers constitutionnalité pouvoir législatif prescription de contrôle constitut possessoire conflits de lois

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG
1 in Verbindung mit Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar und nichtig erklärt (§ 31 Abs.
§ 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG
Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the reference procedure became moot due to the subsequent decision on the same matter.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
2 BvF 1/20
Berlin rent cap statute void for encroaching on federal exclusive competence over civil law
Généré par l'IA
2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20, 2 BvL 1/21
Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality
2 BvF 1/20, 2 BvL 4/20, 2 BvL 5/20
Berlin rent cap statute void for encroaching on federal exclusive competence over civil law
1 BvR 487/20, 1 BvR 515/20, 1 BvR 623/20, 1 BvR 972/20, 1 BvR 1088/20, 1 BvR 1290/20, 1 BvR 1450/20, 1 BvR 1571/20, 1 BvR 1622/20, 1 BvR 1648/20, 1 BvR 1711/20, 1 BvR 1720/20, 1 BvR 1761/20, 1 BvR 1762/20, 1 BvR 1763/20, 1 BvR 1891/20, 1 BvR 2046/20, 1 BvR 2111/20, 1 BvR 2737/20, 1 BvR 19/21, 1 BvR 366/21
Berlin Rent Cap Act: Loss of interest in constitutional complaints following prior declaration of unconstitutionality for lack of legislative competence
1 BvL 2/19
Inadmissibility of reference on constitutionality of rent cap provisions due to deficient substantiation of unconstitutionality
1 BvR 1360/15
Mietpreisbremse: constitutional complaint against rent control law and ordinance rejected for lack of subsidiarity

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the reference procedure became moot due to the subsequent decision on the same matter.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Senatsbeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

Das Verfahren hat sich erledigt.

[GRUENDE]

Mit Beschluss vom 25. März 2021 - 2 BvF 1/20 u.a. - hat der Zweite Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts das Gesetz zur Mietenbegrenzung im Wohnungswesen in Berlin (MietenWoG Bln) in der Fassung des Art. 1 des Gesetzes zur Neuregelung gesetzlicher Vorschriften zur Mietenbegrenzung vom 11. Februar 2020 (Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für Berlin vom 22. Februar 2020 S. 50) für mit Art. 74 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar und nichtig erklärt (§ 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG). Damit hat sich die Richtervorlage gemäß Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG erledigt.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.