Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 2612/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210514.1bvr261219 Généré par l'IA

Challenging statutory basis for animal welfare regulation and isoflurane anesthesia for piglet castration

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 2612/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby leaving the challenged legislation and its underlying administrative framework in force against the complainant. The dispute concerned a direct challenge to Section 21(1), Sentence 1 of the Animal Welfare Act (TierSchG) in its version of December 17, 2018, and the Regulation on the Implementation of Isoflurane Anesthesia for Piglet Castration by Skilled Persons (FerkBetSachkV). The court invoked Section 93d, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a statement of reasons for the non-acceptance, resulting in an unchallengeable procedural dismissal without a substantive review of the norms’ constitutionality.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Challenging statutory basis for animal welfare regulation and isoflurane anesthesia for piglet castration: The dispute concerned a direct challenge to Section 21(1), Sentence 1 of the Animal Welfare Act (TierSchG) in its version of December 17, 2018, and the Regulation on the Implementation of Isoflurane Anesthesia for Piglet Castration by Skilled Persons (FerkBetSachkV). The court invoked Section 93d, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a statement of reasons for the non-acceptance, resulting in an unchallengeable procedural dismissal without a substantive review of the norms’ constitutionality.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
base légale constitutionnalité décision-cadre recours contre des décisions administratives contrôle de la procédure litige non administratif

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvF 1/07
Unconstitutionality of laying hen cage regulations due to flawed consultation procedure violating animal protection mandate
3 B 39/16, 3 B 39/16 (3 C 29/16)
Permissibility of culling chicks under German Animal Welfare Act: defining "reasonable ground" and the weight of economic interests
1 BvR 673/19
Constitutional complaint on veterinary administrative orders: insufficient substantiation of critical evidence and unexhausted administrative remedies
1 BvR 1864/14
Constitutionality of animal sex ban: legal certainty of undefined terms and proportionality of restriction on sexual self-determination
3 B 36/19
Animal welfare association’s right to administrative participation and file access in § 16a TierSchG proceedings under Art. 19(4) GG

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Erfolglose Verfassungsbeschwerde unmittelbar gegen § 21 Abs 1 S 1 TierSchG idF vom 17.12.2018 sowie gegen die Verordnung zur Durchführung der Betäubung mit Isofluran bei der Ferkelkastration durch sachkundige Personen (juris: FerkBetSachkV)

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.