Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvQ 147/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:qk20201212.1bvq014720 Généré par l'IA

Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvQ 147/20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's request for interim relief, finding that the statutory prerequisites were not sufficiently substantiated; consequently, the challenged assembly ban remains in effect. The dispute concerned a preliminary application for an interim order challenging a ban on a public assembly. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was Section 32(1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which requires a detailed demonstration of the requirements for interim relief; the court held that the applicant failed to provide adequate reasoning to meet this burden.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a preliminary application for an interim order challenging a ban on a public assembly. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was Section 32(1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which requires a detailed demonstration of the requirements for interim relief; the court held that the applicant failed to provide adequate reasoning to meet this burden.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé exigence constitutionnelle décision préjudicielle protection juridique motivation suffisante base légale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG
Provision cited as the basis for rejecting the request for interim relief due to insufficient substantiation of the statutory prerequisites.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvQ 48/21
Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements
1 BvR 1005/20
Constitutional complaint challenging a public assembly ban: denial of interim relief due to failure to exhaust administrative court emergency remedies
1 BvQ 130/20
Constitutional interim relief against assembly ban denied for failure to exhaust administrative court remedies
1 BvR 742/20
Rejection of interim relief for assembly ban due to lack of demonstrated ongoing legal interest after partial passage of event duration
2 BvQ 26/18
Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Provision cited as the basis for rejecting the request for interim relief due to insufficient substantiation of the statutory prerequisites.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Eilantrag gegen Versammlungsverbot erfolglos - unzureichende Antragsbegründung - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil die Voraussetzungen des § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG vom Antragsteller nicht ausreichend dargetan sind.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.