Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 1216/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201005.2bvr121619 Généré par l'IA

Full cost reimbursement in constitutional complaint proceedings following mootness via state-level reversal

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 1216/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the State of Saxony to fully reimburse the complainant's necessary costs, granting the applicant a substantive victory as the underlying constitutional complaint was deemed satisfied following the annulment of the challenged procedural order. The dispute arose from a constitutional complaint filed against a decision by a regional court's criminal chamber, which the Saxon Constitutional Court had partially accepted and quashed by lifting the objection against the initial dismissal of the applicant's parallel constitutional complaint at the state level. The decisive legal basis is § 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, under which full cost reimbursement is warranted when a constitutional complaint is rendered moot by the reversal of the contested measure at a lower constitutional level, provided the federal constitutional grievance would have likewise succeeded; the portion of the state complaint dismissed for inadmissibility was considered of subordinate significance and did not preclude the award.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG; Full cost reimbursement in constitutional complaint proceedings following mootness via state-level reversal: The dispute arose from a constitutional complaint filed against a decision by a regional court's criminal chamber, which the Saxon Constitutional Court had partially accepted and quashed by lifting the objection against the initial dismissal of the applicant's parallel constitutional complaint at the state level. The decisive legal basis is § 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, under which full cost reimbursement is warranted when a constitutional complaint is rendered moot by the reversal of the contested measure at a lower constitutional level, provided the federal constitutional grievance would have likewise succeeded; the portion of the state complaint dismissed for inadmissibility was considered of subordinate significance and did not preclude the award.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remboursement de frais griefs de procédure procédure en annulation recours constitutionnel à l'étranger responsabilité de l'État dénonciation pénale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
Legal basis cited in the operative order for the full reimbursement of the complainant's necessary costs following the satisfaction of the constitutional complaint through the reversal of the contested decision.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 85, 109
BVerfGE 86, 90
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 1661/23
Reimbursement of Constitutional Complaint Costs Following Mootness and Self-Inflicted Reversal by Lower Court
1 BvR 614/20
Reimbursement of litigation expenses upon mootness of constitutional complaint following parallel state constitutional court ruling on expression and art freedoms
1 BvR 210/09
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs after declination of moot complaint due to parallel judgment clarifying constitutional status of BKAG provisions
2 BvR 2231/18
Reimbursement of costs after withdrawal of constitutional complaint following administrative revocation
2 BvR 257/21
Reimbursement of legal expenses and subject matter valuation for constitutional complaint declared moot after lower constitutional court annulled the challenged decision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Legal basis cited in the operative order for the full reimbursement of the complainant's necessary costs following the satisfaction of the constitutional complaint through the reversal of the contested decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren nach Erledigung - hier: Aufhebung der angegriffenen Entscheidung durch Landesverfassungsgericht - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Der Freistaat Sachsen hat dem Beschwerdeführer seine notwendigen Auslagen in vollem Umfang zu erstatten.

Nach Erledigung der Verfassungsbeschwerde infolge der Aufhebung des Beschlusses des Landgerichts Görlitz - Außenkammer Bautzen - vom 10. Mai 2019 (13 Qs 46/19) durch Beschluss des Verfassungsgerichtshofs des Freistaates Sachsen vom 28. Mai 2020 (Vf. 72-IV-19), mit dem der parallel vom Beschwerdeführer erhobenen Landesverfassungsbeschwerde teilweise stattgegeben worden ist, entspricht es der Billigkeit, dass der Freistaat Sachsen dem Beschwerdeführer dessen notwendige Auslagen voll erstattet (§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG). Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wäre - entsprechend der teilweisen Stattgabe der Landesverfassungsbeschwerde - im gleichen Umfang erfolgreich gewesen (vgl. BVerfGE 85, 109 ). Soweit der Verfassungsgerichtshof des Freistaates Sachsen die Landesverfassungsbeschwerde als unzulässig verworfen hat, ist der verworfene Teil von untergeordneter Bedeutung (vgl. BVerfGE 86, 90 ).

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.