Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
1 BvQ 89/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:qk20200907.1bvq008920 Généré par l'IA

Interim relief against data collection under the Infection Protection Act rejected for lack of concrete and present impairment of fundamental rights

Numéro de cause 1 BvQ 89/20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s application for interim relief, resulting in a ruling for the respondent. The dispute concerned a challenge to data collection provisions under the German Infection Protection Act (IfSG) governing the statutory reporting system for infectious diseases. The court denied the request because the applicant failed to demonstrate that their personal data had already been recorded in the reporting system or that such collection was concretely imminent; consequently, a subsequent constitutional complaint would lack success due to the absence of direct and present impairment of fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis was § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), with the dismissal relying on the doctrine that the applicant lacked the required standing due to insufficient proof of a concrete and current grievance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Interim relief against data collection under the Infection Protection Act rejected for lack of concrete and present impairment of fundamental rights: The dispute concerned a challenge to data collection provisions under the German Infection Protection Act (IfSG) governing the statutory reporting system for infectious diseases. The court denied the request because the applicant failed to demonstrate that their personal data had already been recorded in the reporting system or that such collection was concretely imminent; consequently, a subsequent constitutional complaint would lack success due to the absence of direct and present impairment of fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis was § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), with the dismissal relying on the doctrine that the applicant lacked the required standing due to insufficient proof of a concrete and current grievance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
protection des données à caractère personnel référé droits fondamentaux protection contre les congés prétention légale défaut de qualité pour agir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the application of interim relief that was denied.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgloser Eilantrag gegen Datenerhebung aufgrund infektionsschutzrechtlichen Meldesystems nach dem Infektionsschutzgesetz (IfSG)

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

[GRUENDE]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gemäß § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG ist abzulehnen. Der Antragsteller trägt nicht vor, dass seine personenbezogenen Daten bereits in das durch die angegriffenen gesetzlichen Vorschriften geregelte Meldesystem gelangt wären oder eine solche Datenerhebung konkret bevorsteht. Eine noch einzulegende Verfassungsbeschwerde des Antragstellers wäre daher mangels eigener, unmittelbarer und gegenwärtiger Betroffenheit in seinen Grundrechten oder grundrechtsgleichen Rechten offensichtlich ohne Erfolgsaussichten.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.