Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 474/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200519.2bvr047420 Généré par l'IA

Parallel constitutional complaint dismissed by reference to identical case

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 474/20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision, thereby dismissing the applicant's challenge and rendering the request for interim relief moot. This non-acceptance decision addressed a constitutional complaint lodged in a parallel proceeding to case 2 BvR 483/20, without specifying the underlying substantive subject matter in the provided text. The court explicitly referred to the decision in the identical parallel case for the full legal reasoning and waived further justification under § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, noting that the decision is final and unappealable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Parallel constitutional complaint dismissed by reference to identical case: This non-acceptance decision addressed a constitutional complaint lodged in a parallel proceeding to case 2 BvR 483/20, without specifying the underlying substantive subject matter in the provided text. The court explicitly referred to the decision in the identical parallel case for the full legal reasoning and waived further justification under § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, noting that the decision is final and unappealable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels égalité de traitement constitutionnelle bien-fondé matériel objet du litige retrait de la requête

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the court's omission of further reasoning by referring to the decision in a parallel case.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 483/20
Interim relief against trial dates: health risk from virus infection vs. constitutional requirements for substantive review and procedural subsidiarity
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1319/20
Constitutional complaint rejected as parallel decision: dispensation with reasoning based on identical prior rulings under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 1234/11
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint based on parallel decision and waiver of further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 BVerfGG
1 BvR 1799/19
Constitutional complaint non-acceptance rendering interim relief moot in parallel decision context
1 BvR 2060/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel decision (Parallelentscheidung) refused for lack of acceptability
1 BvR 1390/11
Constitutional complaint: Non-acceptance due to parallel decision, waiving justification under § 93d BVerfGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the court's omission of further reasoning by referring to the decision in a parallel case.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

[GRUENDE]

Zur Begründung wird auf die Entscheidung im gleichgelagerten Verfahren 2 BvR 483/20 verwiesen.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.