Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
1 BvR 142/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rs20200217.1bvr014215 Généré par l'IA

Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings: determining matter value based on objective significance of the case and legal representation.

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 142/15
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court set the matter value (Gegenstandswert) for the attorney's fees at €230,000, thereby establishing the financial scope for the representation in the case. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint, with the court focusing on the determination of the fee basis rather than the substantive merits of the underlying constitutional claim. Relying on the objective significance of the proceedings and the principle that such proceedings are fostered by legal professional activity, the Court applied established fee assessment doctrines to justify the high valuation, ensuring the calculation reflects the complexity and importance of the constitutional litigation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

BVerfGE 79, 365; Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings: determining matter value based on objective significance of the case and legal representation: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint, with the court focusing on the determination of the fee basis rather than the substantive merits of the underlying constitutional claim. Relying on the objective significance of the proceedings and the principle that such proceedings are fostered by legal professional activity, the Court applied established fee assessment doctrines to justify the high valuation, ensuring the calculation reflects the complexity and importance of the constitutional litigation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fixation des honoraires d'avocat valeur litigieuse complexité de la procédure principe constitutionnel représentation légale examen de la situation financière

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
Cited in the dispositive to justify the determination of the matter value based on the objective significance of the proceedings and the promotion of the case by legal professional activity.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Gegenstandswert auf 230.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertdreißigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365

Cited in the dispositive to justify the determination of the matter value based on the objective significance of the proceedings and the promotion of the case by legal professional activity.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Unter Berücksichtigung der hohen objektiven Bedeutung des Verfahrens und seiner Förderung durch die anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Gegenstandswert auf 230.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertdreißigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.