Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 1799/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20191001.1bvr179919 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint non-acceptance rendering interim relief moot in parallel decision context

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 1799/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby rendering the applicant’s pending motion for interim relief moot; the First Senate’s First Chamber upheld the challenged lower-court proceedings by dismissing the complaint as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a constitutional challenge to a parallel decision issued by a lower court, with the complainant seeking to overturn that judgment and secure interim protective measures. The court’s refusal was grounded in § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the omission of a reasoned justification for chamber decisions that do not set aside a lower-court judgment, and the resulting non-acceptance of the complaint was declared final and unappealable under § 40(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (GOBVerfG).

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Constitutional complaint non-acceptance rendering interim relief moot in parallel decision context: The dispute concerned a constitutional challenge to a parallel decision issued by a lower court, with the complainant seeking to overturn that judgment and secure interim protective measures. The court’s refusal was grounded in § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the omission of a reasoned justification for chamber decisions that do not set aside a lower-court judgment, and the resulting non-acceptance of the complaint was declared final and unappealable under § 40(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (GOBVerfG).

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels procédure pendante référé règlement intérieur objet du litige principe constitutionnel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Procedural basis cited in the order to declare the request for interim relief moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 931/25
Constitutional complaint: refusal of acceptance without reasoning and mootness of interim relief application
2 BvR 1349/16
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint and mootness of interim relief request
2 BvR 611/19
Constitutional complaint: non-acceptance by the Federal Constitutional Court without reasoned justification
1 BvR 1234/11
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint based on parallel decision and waiver of further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 BVerfGG
2 BvR 1607/13
Constitutional complaint over unreasoned non-acceptance; scope of mandatory reasoning duties for Chamber decisions

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Procedural basis cited in the order to declare the request for interim relief moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

1. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

2. Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.