Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 1800/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20191001.1bvr180019 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint against parallel judicial decision; admissibility and dismissal of application for provisional injunction

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 1800/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, First Chamber) declined to admit the constitutional complaint for a decision, thereby rendering the application for a provisional injunction moot, with no further reasoning provided. The case involved a constitutional complaint against a prior decision issued as a "parallel decision," challenging the underlying judicial act or its procedural handling. The operative outcome is based on the chamber's discretion not to accept the complaint for decision under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), establishing that the challenged lower court or administrative action remains in force.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Constitutional complaint against parallel judicial decision; admissibility and dismissal of application for provisional injunction: The case involved a constitutional complaint against a prior decision issued as a "parallel decision," challenging the underlying judicial act or its procedural handling. The operative outcome is based on the chamber's discretion not to accept the complaint for decision under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), establishing that the challenged lower court or administrative action remains in force.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
pouvoir d'appréciation du juge recours constitutionnel à l'étranger questions procédurales réclamation administrative prorogation de compétence procédure préjudicielle d'urgence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Cited in the dispositive to declare the application for a provisional injunction moot as a consequence of the constitutional complaint not being admitted.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1799/19
Constitutional complaint non-acceptance rendering interim relief moot in parallel decision context
1 BvR 443/16
Constitutional complaint dismissed without reasons under § 93d BVerfGG, rendering interim relief application moot
2 BvR 126/15
Constitutional complaint regarding the rejection of a motion for provisional measures
1 BvR 2060/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel decision (Parallelentscheidung) refused for lack of acceptability
1 BvR 1819/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel court decision declared inadmissible

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Cited in the dispositive to declare the application for a provisional injunction moot as a consequence of the constitutional complaint not being admitted.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

1. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

2. Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.