Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 921/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190822.1bvr092119 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint against refusal of deadline reinstatement; dispensation from statement of reasons under § 93d BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 921/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision without entering into the merits of the accompanying motion for reinstatement of the deadline, rendering the decision unchallengeable. The case involved a procedural constitutional complaint where the complainant challenged a lower court’s procedural handling, specifically seeking relief from a missed deadline through a motion for reinstatement. The Court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a written statement of reasons, thereby denying the relief sought by the applicant.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against refusal of deadline reinstatement; dispensation from statement of reasons under § 93d BVerfGG: The case involved a procedural constitutional complaint where the complainant challenged a lower court’s procedural handling, specifically seeking relief from a missed deadline through a motion for reinstatement. The Court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a written statement of reasons, thereby denying the relief sought by the applicant.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délai légal de procédure grief de violation constitutionnelle motivation droit à la résolution du contrat grief constitutionnel délais de recours

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written statement of reasons for the refusal to accept the constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1136/17
Insufficiency of substantive reasoning for constitutional complaint due to missing prior procedural decisions and unexcused delay in filing required documents
2 BvR 2589/11
Constitutional complaint: missed two-week deadline for reinstatement under § 93 Abs. 2 S. 2 BVerfGG
2 BvR 30/21
Reinstatement of rights denied for failure to substantiate non-fault in missing constitutional complaint deadline
2 BvR 834/19
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for lack of substantiation; non-extendability of filing deadline
1 BvR 3444/14
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for missed filing deadline; reinstatement denied due to lack of unattributable delay

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written statement of reasons for the refusal to accept the constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, ohne dass es auf den Wiedereinsetzungsantrag ankäme.

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.