Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 2194/18 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190822.2bvr219418 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint for lack of exhaustion of legal remedies filed before decision on hearing objection

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 2194/18
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the complainant's application for reimbursement of necessary expenses and denied legal aid, effectively leaving the unmerited constitutional complaint and the underlying administrative litigation proceedings unaffected. The dispute arose when a complainant filed a constitutional complaint against a lower court's handling of a hearing objection (Anhörungsrüge) before the administrative court had issued a decision on that objection. The court held the complaint inadmissible because the statutory exhaustion of legal remedies had not been met under § 90(2) Sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), as the complainant failed to demonstrate that a serious and unavoidable disadvantage would have resulted had the legal path been exhausted first. Consequently, the denial of legal aid was justified under § 114(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which requires an expectation of success for such grants.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 90 Absatz 2 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz, § 114 Absatz 1 Zivilprozessordnung; Constitutional complaint for lack of exhaustion of legal remedies filed before decision on hearing objection: The dispute arose when a complainant filed a constitutional complaint against a lower court's handling of a hearing objection (Anhörungsrüge) before the administrative court had issued a decision on that objection. The court held the complaint inadmissible because the statutory exhaustion of legal remedies had not been met under § 90(2) Sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), as the complainant failed to demonstrate that a serious and unavoidable disadvantage would have resulted had the legal path been exhausted first. Consequently, the denial of legal aid was justified under § 114(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which requires an expectation of success for such grants.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
épuisement des voies de recours motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels procédure d'assistance judiciaire contestation civile aide d'urgence constitutionnelle exceptions procédurales tardives

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 90 Absatz 2 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Main ground for declaring the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to the lack of exhaustion of legal remedies.
§ 114 Absatz 1 Zivilprozessordnung
Provision applied to justify the denial of legal aid because the complaint had no prospect of success.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 689/11
Denial of legal aid and expense reimbursement due to lack of exhaustion of legal remedies pending hearing order decision
1 BvR 2152/20
Constitutional complaint dismissed for failure to exhaust ordinary legal remedies; legal aid denied due to lack of prospect of success.
1 BvR 599/22
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to exhaust legal remedies and insufficient substantiation; denial of non-lawyer legal representative for lack of necessity and utility
1 BvR 2584/16
Constitutional complaint inadmissible due to untimely submission of hearing objection decision despite exhaustion of legal remedies
1 BvR 2066/18
Denial of constitutional complaint cost reimbursement due to exhaustion of legal path pending hearing objection decision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 90 Absatz 2 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Main ground for declaring the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to the lack of exhaustion of legal remedies.

§ 114 Absatz 1 Zivilprozessordnung

Provision applied to justify the denial of legal aid because the complaint had no prospect of success.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Ablehnung der Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Unzulässigkeit der Verfassungsbeschwerde bei Beschwerdeerhebung vor fachgerichtlicher Entscheidung über Anhörungsrüge - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag des Beschwerdeführers auf Erstattung seiner notwendigen Auslagen vom 7. August 2019 wird abgelehnt. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde war unzulässig, weil der Rechtsweg noch nicht erschöpft war, § 90 Absatz 2 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz. Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Verfassungsbeschwerde erhoben, bevor das Verwaltungsgericht über die eingelegte Anhörungsrüge entschieden hatte. Gründe dafür, dass ihm bei Erschöpfung des Rechtswegs ein schwerer und unabwendbarer Nachteil entstanden wäre, hat er nicht vorgetragen.

Der Prozesskostenhilfeantrag wird abgelehnt. Wegen der fehlenden Rechtswegerschöpfung hatte die erhobene Verfassungsbeschwerde keine Aussicht auf Erfolg, § 114 Absatz 1 Zivilprozessordnung.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.