Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 1137/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190211.1bvr113717 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint non-admission under § 93d BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 1137/17
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to admit the constitutional complaint to decision, rendering the outcome final and unappealable. The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging a lower court decision, with the specific subject matter and underlying facts redacted from the provided text. The Court dismissed the matter without providing a written justification, relying on § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, which permits the omission of reasons in non-admission decisions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint non-admission under § 93d BVerfGG: The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging a lower court decision, with the specific subject matter and underlying facts redacted from the provided text. The Court dismissed the matter without providing a written justification, relying on § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, which permits the omission of reasons in non-admission decisions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels juridiction constitutionnelle droit de refuser de témoigner violation du devoir de motiver objet du litige nullité d'une élection

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited to justify the omission of the written reasoning for the non-admission of the constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1787/20
Constitutional complaint non-admission under § 93d BVerfGG without reasoned decision
1 BvR 2470/21
Constitutional complaint against judicial decision; non-admission without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 2831/17
Waiver of reasoning for non-admission of constitutional complaint under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 161/17
Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 2318/14
Constitutional complaint rejected due to non-acceptance without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited to justify the omission of the written reasoning for the non-admission of the constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.