Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 981/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180924.1bvr098117 Généré par l'IA

Determination of the amount in dispute in constitutional complaint proceedings based on subjective and objective significance

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 981/17
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court fixed the value of the subject matter of the legal practice in this constitutional complaint proceeding at €150,000, a determination influenced by the procedure's subjective and specific objective significance and the facilitation of the process by attorney activity. This decision addresses the procedural issue of "Gegenstandswertfestsetzung" (determination of the amount in dispute) within a constitutional complaint, serving to establish the financial scope for associated costs. The decisive legal basis relies on the assessment of subjective and special objective importance, consistent with the Court’s prior doctrine that such value determinations are adjusted to reflect the significance of the proceedings and the contribution of professional legal representation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

BVerfGE 79, 365; Determination of the amount in dispute in constitutional complaint proceedings based on subjective and objective significance: This decision addresses the procedural issue of "Gegenstandswertfestsetzung" (determination of the amount in dispute) within a constitutional complaint, serving to establish the financial scope for associated costs. The decisive legal basis relies on the assessment of subjective and special objective importance, consistent with the Court’s prior doctrine that such value determinations are adjusted to reflect the significance of the proceedings and the contribution of professional legal representation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
valeur litigieuse frais de la procédure fixation des honoraires doctrine juridique motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels examen de la situation financière

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
Cited in the operative order to justify the fixation of the value of the subject matter based on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and attorney activity.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfahren auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 16/13
Valuation of amount in dispute in constitutional complaint proceedings based on objective significance
1 BvR 142/15
Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings: determining matter value based on objective significance of the case and legal representation.
1 BvR 249/15
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings based on objective significance
2 BvR 882/09
Valuation of subject matter in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 883/14
Judicial review of fee valuation: Setting the subject matter value for constitutional complaint proceedings above statutory minimum based on objective significance under RVG §§ 14, 37

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365

Cited in the operative order to justify the fixation of the value of the subject matter based on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and attorney activity.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Unter Berücksichtigung der subjektiven und besonderen objektiven Bedeutung des Verfahrens und seiner Förderung durch die anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfahren auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.