Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 2728/13, 2 BvR 2730/13, 2 BvR 2731/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180516.2bvr272813 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint cost allocation and subject value determination based on contribution to clarifying fundamental legal questions

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 2728/13, 2 BvR 2730/13, 2 BvR 2731/13
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the respondent state to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary attorney fees and fixed the matter's value for procedural costs at €1,000,000 per case. This decision addresses ancillary cost allocations in constitutional complaint proceedings, following a substantive ruling where the complaints were partially dismissed and partially rejected. The Court applied Section 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, determining that a partial refund was equitable because the proceedings, despite their mixed outcome, contributed to clarifying issues of fundamental legal significance, while Sections 37(2) and 22(1) of the Lawyers' Fees Act governed the valuation of the legal matter.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 RVG; Constitutional complaint cost allocation and subject value determination based on contribution to clarifying fundamental legal questions: This decision addresses ancillary cost allocations in constitutional complaint proceedings, following a substantive ruling where the complaints were partially dismissed and partially rejected. The Court applied Section 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, determining that a partial refund was equitable because the proceedings, despite their mixed outcome, contributed to clarifying issues of fundamental legal significance, while Sections 37(2) and 22(1) of the Lawyers' Fees Act governed the valuation of the legal matter.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
honoraires d'avocat répartition des frais questions procédurales motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels procédure d'estimation juridiction constitutionnelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG
Basis for the order to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary legal costs.
§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG
Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.
§ 37 Abs. 2 RVG
Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 36, 146
BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ; 116, 69 ; 130, 1 ).
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 1390/12, 2 BvR 1438/12
Partial cost reimbursement and subject matter value assessment in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 34a BVerfGG and §§ 37, 22 RVG
2 BvR 916/11, 2 BvR 636/12
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 740/10
Statutory basis for setting the subject matter value of attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 571/10
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 946/19
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Basis for the order to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary legal costs.

§ 37 Abs. 2 RVG

Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG

Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Anordnung der teilweisen Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren (§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG) sowie Gegenstandswertfestsetzung

[TENOR]

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu einem Drittel zu erstatten.

Der Wert des Gegenstandes der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit der Bevollmächtigten im Hauptsacheverfahren wird jeweils auf 1.000.000 € (in Worten: eine Million Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).

[GRUENDE]

Die Entscheidung über die Anordnung der Erstattung der Auslagen beruht auf § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG. Die Verfassungsbeschwerden sind zwar teilweise verworfen und teilweise zurückgewiesen worden, haben aber in der Sache zur Klärung von Fragen von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung beigetragen (vgl. BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ; 116, 69 ; 130, 1 ).

Es entspricht der Billigkeit, den Beschwerdeführern die durch das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren entstandenen notwendigen Auslagen in Höhe von einem Drittel zu erstatten.