Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
2 BvQ 26/18 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:qk20180320.2bvq002618 Généré par l'IA

Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites

Numéro de cause 2 BvQ 26/18
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a constitutional complaint for interim relief as inadmissible, ruling in favor of the respondent state authorities. The applicant sought a temporary injunction under Section 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, but failed to provide the required sufficient substantiation of the prerequisites for such an order. The court emphasized that the applicant did not adequately demonstrate the imminent risk or specific harm necessary to justify the extraordinary procedural remedy, citing established case law on the strict substantiation standards for emergency relief. Consequently, the request for an interim order was denied, leaving the contested administrative situation unchanged.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites: The applicant sought a temporary injunction under Section 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, but failed to provide the required sufficient substantiation of the prerequisites for such an order. The court emphasized that the applicant did not adequately demonstrate the imminent risk or specific harm necessary to justify the extraordinary procedural remedy, citing established case law on the strict substantiation standards for emergency relief. Consequently, the request for an interim order was denied, leaving the contested administrative situation unchanged.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé condition de recevabilité préjudice imminent licenciement administratif état d'urgence motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the specific statutory prerequisite that was not sufficiently substantiated, resulting in the rejection of the application for interim relief.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer eA mit Tenorbegründung: Voraussetzungen des § 32 BVerfGG nicht hinreichend substantiiert dargelegt

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt. Er ist unzulässig; es fehlt an der hinreichenden Substantiierung des Vorliegens der Voraussetzungen des § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 17. November 2006 - 1 BvQ 33/06 - juris; Beschlüsse der 3. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 28. November 2008 - 2 BvQ 36/08 - und 10. September 2009 - 2 BvQ 58/09 - juris).

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.