Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 161/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170306.1bvr016117 Généré par l'IA

Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 161/17
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany did not admit the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the challenge unsuccessful and leaving the lower court's decision in force; the court explicitly refrained from providing a reasoning for this non-acceptance under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG). The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint filed with the First Senate's First Chamber, specifically identified by case number 1 BvR 161/17, challenging a prior judicial act without the specific subject matter detailed in the unexplained order. The decisive legal basis was the procedural authority to issue a non-admission order without grounds under § 93d BVerfGG, which renders the decision final and unappealable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint filed with the First Senate's First Chamber, specifically identified by case number 1 BvR 161/17, challenging a prior judicial act without the specific subject matter detailed in the unexplained order. The decisive legal basis was the procedural authority to issue a non-admission order without grounds under § 93d BVerfGG, which renders the decision final and unappealable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels objet du litige violation du devoir de motiver acte de procédure moyens invocables droit de refuser de témoigner

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a reasoning for the non-admission of the constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1137/17
Constitutional complaint non-admission under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 1787/20
Constitutional complaint non-admission under § 93d BVerfGG without reasoned decision
1 BvR 2470/21
Constitutional complaint against judicial decision; non-admission without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 2831/17
Waiver of reasoning for non-admission of constitutional complaint under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 1334/16, 1 BvR 1335/16, 1 BvR 1336/16
Non-admission of constitutional complaints challenging criminal proceedings without reasoning under § 93d BVerfG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a reasoning for the non-admission of the constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.