Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 1395/10 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120413.2bvr139510 Généré par l'IA

Child benefit eligibility for adult children temporarily suspending vocational training for childcare of own offspring

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 1395/10
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby upholding the lower courts' denial of child benefit and leaving the administrative and financial rulings in force. The dispute concerned whether the applicant was entitled to monthly child benefit for a full-time employed, married, and fully self-supporting adult daughter, following the daughter's temporary interruption of her vocational training to care for her own children. The decisive legal basis was the interpretation of German social security law regarding the eligibility conditions for child benefit, specifically determining that a suspension of vocational training for childcare purposes does not preserve the status of a "child" under the applicable statutes for benefit entitlement, rendering the complaint inadmissible without further substantiation of a fundamental rights violation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Child benefit eligibility for adult children temporarily suspending vocational training for childcare of own offspring: The dispute concerned whether the applicant was entitled to monthly child benefit for a full-time employed, married, and fully self-supporting adult daughter, following the daughter's temporary interruption of her vocational training to care for her own children. The decisive legal basis was the interpretation of German social security law regarding the eligibility conditions for child benefit, specifically determining that a suspension of vocational training for childcare purposes does not preserve the status of a "child" under the applicable statutes for benefit entitlement, rendering the complaint inadmissible without further substantiation of a fundamental rights violation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit aux allocations familiales suspension du droit à l'indemnité enfants majeurs prestation temporaire sécurité sociale droits de l'enfant
Généré par l'IA
III B 61/10
Child benefit interruption of vocational training for childcare eligibility and right to be heard standard
III S 34/12 (PKH)
Child benefit eligibility for child interrupting education to care for own offspring: lack of childcare facilities insufficient to establish need for training place under § 32 Abs. 4 S. 1 Nr. 2 c EStG.
III R 34/13
Child benefit for married adult children in vocational training: irrelevance of marital status and income limits under reformed § 32 EStG
III R 17/07
Child benefit eligibility for vocational internship versus employment and waiting for training placement
XI R 44/11
Child benefit for disabled adult: age limit, burden of proof for self-support incapacity, and constitutional validity of age threshold

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeld - Keine Berücksichtigung eines volljährigen Kindes bei Unterbrechung der Berufsausbildung zur Betreuung eigener Kinder