Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 367/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rs20120504.1bvr036712 Généré par l'IA

Interim suspension of call-by-call price announcement mandate due to missing transitional period

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 367/12
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court granted the requested interim relief, ordering that the statutory provision mandating price announcements for call-by-call telephone calls not enter into force prior to August 1, 2012, while denying all other aspects of the application; the applicants prevailed in securing a moratorium on the disputed regulation. The dispute arose from a challenge to a federal telecommunications amendment adopted by the Bundestag in February 2012, which introduced immediate pricing obligations for specific telephone services without providing a transitional period for compliance. Relying on Section 32, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court issued this preliminary ruling to prevent imminent legal effects, deferring the entry into force of the specific norm to allow for a reasonable transition period, with the full grounds to be communicated separately to the parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG; Interim suspension of call-by-call price announcement mandate due to missing transitional period: The dispute arose from a challenge to a federal telecommunications amendment adopted by the Bundestag in February 2012, which introduced immediate pricing obligations for specific telephone services without providing a transitional period for compliance. Relying on Section 32, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court issued this preliminary ruling to prevent imminent legal effects, deferring the entry into force of the specific norm to allow for a reasonable transition period, with the full grounds to be communicated separately to the parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
services de télécommunication référé dispositions transitoires délai de suspension effets des arrêts préjudiciels entrée en vigueur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Die Begründung wird den Beteiligten gesondert übermittelt (§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG).
§ 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for separating the written reasoning from the immediate operative order regarding the interim injunction.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 2058/22
Interim relief to suspend statutory termination right in telecommunications access contracts: insufficient proof of irreparable economic harm
6 C 3/13
Constitutional incompatibility of limiting retroactive effect of telecommunication tariff approvals to prior interim payment orders
1 BvQ 48/16
Interim relief for suspension of enforcement against favorable judgment on inclusion in radio sales model: unproven fundamental rights violation and lack of imminent severe disadvantage.
6 C 33/13
Comparative market assessment in telecom tariff approval and constitutionality of retroactivity exclusions in enforcement proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for separating the written reasoning from the immediate operative order regarding the interim injunction.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Aufschub des Inkrafttretens der Reglungen über die Einführung einer Preisansagepflicht für Call-by-Call-Telefonate - Fehlen einer Übergangsfrist - hier: Vorabentscheidung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 2 BVerfGG

[TENOR]

Artikel 1 Nummer 62 Buchstabe a) aa) des vom Deutschen Bundestag am 9. Februar 2012 beschlossenen und vom Bundespräsidenten am 3. Mai 2012 ausgefertigten Gesetzes zur Änderung telekommunikationsrechtlicher Regelungen tritt nicht vor dem 1. August 2012 in Kraft.

Im Übrigen wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung abgelehnt.

...

Die Begründung wird den Beteiligten gesondert übermittelt (§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG).