Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 1010/08 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rs20101013.2bvr101008 Généré par l'IA

Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 1010/08
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court fixed the subject matter value for the attorney’s representation at €1,000,000 in the main proceedings and €100,000 in the preliminary injunction proceedings, while dismissing the applicant’s request for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in the interim measure procedure. This decision addresses administrative determinations in a constitutional complaint and the associated preliminary injunction procedure, specifically concerning the valuation of legal services and the recovery of litigation costs. The ruling relies on §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers’ Fee Act (RVG), which govern the calculation of subject matter values and the conditions for cost reimbursement in constitutional court proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement: This decision addresses administrative determinations in a constitutional complaint and the associated preliminary injunction procedure, specifically concerning the valuation of legal services and the recovery of litigation costs. The ruling relies on §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers’ Fee Act (RVG), which govern the calculation of subject matter values and the conditions for cost reimbursement in constitutional court proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fixation des honoraires d'avocat émolument administratif procédure d'estimation remboursement de frais représentation légale recouvrement des frais

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG
Provision cited alongside § 37 to govern the calculation and fixing of the fee-relevant subject matter value.
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG
Provision cited to justify the determination of the subject matter value for the attorney's activities in the main and provisional proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 328/18
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional relief proceedings
2 BvR 1866/17, 2 BvR 1314/18
Determination of subject-matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and preliminary injunction proceedings
1 BvR 857/07
Valuation of attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 916/11, 2 BvR 636/12
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
1 BvQ 35/09
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional interim injunction proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG

Provision cited to justify the determination of the subject matter value for the attorney's activities in the main and provisional proceedings.

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG

Provision cited alongside § 37 to govern the calculation and fixing of the fee-relevant subject matter value.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren sowie im eA-Verfahren - Ablehnung der Auslagenerstattung im eA-Verfahren

[TENOR]

1. Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit des Bevollmächtigten zu 1. im Hauptsacheverfahren wird auf 1.000.000

€ (in Worten: eine Million Euro) und im Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf 100.000 € (in Worten: einhunderttausend

Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).

2. Der Antrag auf Erstattung der Auslagen in dem Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.