Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
VR.2005.00003 • VG ZH VR.2005.00003 Généré par l'IA

Stream Expansion Land Compensation Appeal

Numéro de cause VR.2005.00003
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Zurich (CH-ZH)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned an appeal regarding compensation due for land cession related to the expansion of a stream in a municipality. The court determined that it had jurisdiction, that the relevant compensation should be based on market value, and that the calculation of lost value for partial expropriations, specifically involving front yard land, required an assessment, ultimately employing an average calculation linked to a comparison method. The court found that the appellant's arguments did not demonstrate that the chosen estimation method was unlawful, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG; Stream Expansion Land Compensation Appeal: The court determined that it had jurisdiction, that the relevant compensation should be based on market value, and that the calculation of lost value for partial expropriations, specifically involving front yard land, required an assessment, ultimately employing an average calculation linked to a comparison method. The court found that the appellant's arguments did not demonstrate that the chosen estimation method was unlawful, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnité d'expropriation droit foncier redevance pour droits d'eau taxation d'office rachat d'un droit réel limité terrain communal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG
This provision is cited in the legal norms section, but since the final orders (dispositive) are not provided in the text excerpt, the primary ground for the final decision cannot be definitively identified based on the instruction to only use provisions explicitly cited in the dispositive orders. If this provision were the basis for the final ruling (e.g., allowing or dismissing the appeal regarding the compensation), it would be listed first. Given the excerpt ends before the numbered orders, and this is the only substantive law mentioned near the title/summary, it is tentatively included as the likely basis for the merits decision ('Abweisung der Rekurse').
Généré par l'IA
VR.2012.00003
Land Cession, Sidewalk Contribution, and Compensation Estimation Dispute
VB.2012.00298
Appeal Regarding Stream Relocation and Building Permit Coordination
VR.2024.00003
Expropriation Compensation Valuation Dispute on Developed Land
VR.2000.00005
Expropriation Compensation Valuation and Jurisdiction on Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG

This provision is cited in the legal norms section, but since the final orders (dispositive) are not provided in the text excerpt, the primary ground for the final decision cannot be definitively identified based on the instruction to only use provisions explicitly cited in the dispositive orders. If this provision were the basis for the final ruling (e.g., allowing or dismissing the appeal regarding the compensation), it would be listed first. Given the excerpt ends before the numbered orders, and this is the only substantive law mentioned near the title/summary, it is tentatively included as the likely basis for the merits decision ('Abweisung der Rekurse').

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2005.00003

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

Druckansicht

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2005.00003 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 07.04.2006 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · Landabtretung · Entschädigung für den Ausbau des Chämtnerbachs in Wetzikon: Zuständigkeit des Verwaltungsgerichts und Verfahrensablauf (E.1). Für die Bestimmung der Entschädigung ist der Verkehrswert massgebend (E.2.1). Standpunkte der Parteien (E.2.2-2.4). Bei der Enteignung von Teilflächen, insbesondere von Vorgartenland, ist die Ermittlung der Verkehrswerteinbusse oft mit schwierigen Problemen verbunden.

Vorliegend gelangte die Durchschnittsberechnung verknüpft mit der Vergleichsmethode zur Anwendung (E.3.1). Was der Rekurrent dagegen vorbringt, vermag die gewählte Schätzungsmethode nicht als rechtswidrig darzutun (E.3.2). Abweisung der Rekurse (E.4). · --- · Stichworte: · ABTRETUNGSENTSCHÄDIGUNG FORMELLE ENTEIGNUNG VERGLEICHSMETHODE VERKEHRSWERT VORGARTENLAND · Rechtsnormen: · § 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG · Publikationen: · BEZ 2006 Nr. 35 S. 41 RB 2006 Nr. 118 · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 2