Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
VB.2025.00505 • VG ZH VB.2025.00505 Généré par l'IA

Lawyer's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Qualified Electronic Signature

Numéro de cause VB.2025.00505
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Zurich (CH-ZH)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A lawyer's appeal concerning registration on a list according to Art. 28 of the Federal Act on Attorneys (BGFA) was dismissed without consideration because the appeal lacked the qualified electronic signature required for submissions. The court reasoned that while the missing signature constituted a formal defect generally rectifiable, a practicing lawyer is expected to know the formal requirements for written or electronic submissions, thus precluding the granting of a subsequent deadline for correction under the relevant procedural rules.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 28 BGFA, Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG, Art. 139 Abs. II ZPO CH; Lawyer's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Qualified Electronic Signature: 28 of the Federal Act on Attorneys (BGFA) was dismissed without consideration because the appeal lacked the qualified electronic signature required for submissions. The court reasoned that while the missing signature constituted a formal defect generally rectifiable, a practicing lawyer is expected to know the formal requirements for written or electronic submissions, thus precluding the granting of a subsequent deadline for correction under the relevant procedural rules.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
absence de signature signature électronique délai légal de procédure interdiction de représentation de l'avocat exigences de forme retrait de la requête

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 28 BGFA
· Rechtsgebiet: · Anwaltsrecht · Betreff: · Eintragung in die Liste gemäss Art. 28 BGFA · Eintragung in die Liste gemäss Art.
Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG
The appeal was not admitted because the formal deficiency (lack of qualified electronic signature) did not warrant setting a deadline for rectification under this provision.
Art. 139 Abs. II ZPO CH
This provision is cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal, but the exclusion rule requires it to be cited in the dispositive. Since the dispositive is not fully provided but the decision indicates 'Nichteintreten' (non-admission), and given the context of procedural application, this reference might be implicitly related to the decision's outcome, but based strictly on the provided text fragment indicating citation in the context of the reasoning for non-admission, and assuming the dispositive aligns with the conclusion derived from Art. 56 VRG, I will stick only to explicitly cited procedural rules relevant to the orders.
Généré par l'IA
VB.2019.00778
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Qualified Electronic Signature
RB220006
Electronic Signature Defect and Inadequate Substantiation Bar Appeal and Legal Aid Denial
VB.2023.00391
Refusal of Appeal Based on Electronic Signature Deficiency; Costs Imposed on Attorney.
PC190022
Appeal Deemed Non-Existent for Lack of Proper Signature
RB220005
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Electronic Signature and Substantive Merit

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG

The appeal was not admitted because the formal deficiency (lack of qualified electronic signature) did not warrant setting a deadline for rectification under this provision.

Art. 139 Abs. II ZPO CH

This provision is cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal, but the exclusion rule requires it to be cited in the dispositive. Since the dispositive is not fully provided but the decision indicates 'Nichteintreten' (non-admission), and given the context of procedural application, this reference might be implicitly related to the decision's outcome, but based strictly on the provided text fragment indicating citation in the context of the reasoning for non-admission, and assuming the dispositive aligns with the conclusion derived from Art. 56 VRG, I will stick only to explicitly cited procedural rules relevant to the orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2025.00505

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=225210&W10_KEY=13317001&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2025.00505 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 18.08.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Anwaltsrecht · Betreff: · Eintragung in die Liste gemäss Art. 28 BGFA · Eintragung in die Liste gemäss Art. 28 BGFA. Die Beschwerde verfügt über keine qualifizierte elektronische Signatur des Beschwerdeführers. Dabei handelt es sich um einen formellen und prinzipiell verbesserungsfähigen Mangel. Von einem Rechtsanwalt wie dem Beschwerdeführer darf jedoch erwartet werden, dass ihm die für schriftliche oder elektronische Eingaben geltenden Formvorschriften bekannt sind, weshalb ihm keine Frist zur Nachbesserung gemäss Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG anzusetzen war bzw. ist (E. 2.2).

Nichteintreten. · --- · Stichworte: · ELEKTRONISCHE EINGABE NACHFRIST OFFENSICHTLICH UNZULÄSSIG QUALIFIZIERTE ELEKTRONISCHE SIGNATUR · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 28 BGFA § 38b Abs. I lit. a VRG § 56 Abs. I VRG § 71 VRG § 139 Abs. II ZPO CH · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4