Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
90.2002.40 • TRPI TI 90.2002.40 Généré par l'IA

Territorial Planning Court Hearing Record, February 14, 2003

Numéro de cause 90.2002.40
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

This document is the record of a hearing before the Territorial Planning Court/Appeals Court concerning an unspecified matter, with multiple appellants represented by counsel challenging a decision, and participation from the municipal government and the State Council's territorial planning division. As the provided text only constitutes the heading and attendance list for the hearing held on February 14, 2003, no facts about the underlying dispute or the court's reasoning for any verdict can be ascertained.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Territorial Planning Court Hearing Record, February 14, 2003: As the provided text only constitutes the heading and attendance list for the hearing held on February 14, 2003, no facts about the underlying dispute or the court's reasoning for any verdict can be ascertained.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure de planification objet du litige audition des parties révision du plan d'affectation mention annonces publiques Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.2002.40 · Lugano 14 febbraio 2003 · Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Tribunale della pianificazione del territorioTribunale d'appello

Verbale di udienza

Sopralluogo del 13 marzo 2003 a __________

Oggetto: __________

Ricorrente: · 1. ____________________, ____________________ 2. __________n. __________, ____________________ 3. __________, __________ 1, 2, 3 rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, ____________________

Dinanzi al giudice: · __________ __________, presidente

Vicecancelliere

Sono inoltre presenti: · - per il Municipio di __________

- per il Consiglio di Stato

-

Firme dei presenti all’udienza sul verbale

manoscritto.

Intimazione:

-

avv. __________ __________, Via __________.__________. __________, ______ -

-

Municipio di ______ -

Dipartimento del territorio, divisione della pianificazione territoriale, _______