Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
90.2000.58 • TRPI TI 90.2000.58 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Planning Zone Establishment

Numéro de cause 90.2000.58
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Frais judiciaires sans frais
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party filed an appeal against a State Council decision that established a cantonal planning zone to safeguard studies related to priority projects outlined in the regional planning for several municipalities. The court noted that during the hearing, the appellant, through their representative, withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings were exhausted and decreed the appeal stricken from the record, with no fees or costs levied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Planning Zone Establishment: The court noted that during the hearing, the appellant, through their representative, withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings were exhausted and decreed the appeal stricken from the record, with no fees or costs levied.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
frais d'élaboration des plans non-classement audition des parties zone à planification obligatoire qualité pour recourir contre permis plan d'urbanisme Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF
Implied, as the court noted the case was concluded by withdrawal and did not impose costs or fees.
Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF
Cited implicitly by the decision not to levy fees or costs.
Généré par l'IA
90.2000.49
Cantonal Planning Zone Appeal Struck After Withdrawal
90.1997.59
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Cantonal Regulatory Plan
90.2002.134
Appeal Withdrawal in Swiss Planning Zone Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF

Implied, as the court noted the case was concluded by withdrawal and did not impose costs or fees.

Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF

Cited implicitly by the decision not to levy fees or costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.2000.58 · Lugano 10 gennaio 2005 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 25 settembre 2000 della

RI 1 patr. da: RA 1 contro

la decisione 27 giugno 2000 (n. 2771) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha adottato una zona di pianificazione cantonale a salvaguardia degli studi relativi alla progettazione delle opere prioritarie previste nella pianificazione comprensoriale del __________ e concernente i comuni di __________, __________, __________, __________ e __________;

preso atto che in sede d'udienza 17 novembre 2004 la ricorrente, per il tramite del proprio patrocinatore, ha ritirato il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. Intimazione a:

terzi implicati · PI 1 rappr. da: RA 3 CO 1 rappr. da: RA 2 Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio · Il segretario