Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
90.1999.80 • TRPI TI 90.1999.80 Généré par l'IA

Appellate Planning Court On-Site Inspection Record

Numéro de cause 90.1999.80
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate planning court held an on-site inspection concerning an unspecified matter where the appellant was neither present nor represented, while the municipality and state council were present. The provided text is merely the initial record of an on-site visit and hearing, detailing the date, location, parties present, and subject of the proceeding, but it does not contain any description of the underlying situation or the court's reasoning or final verdict on the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appellate Planning Court On-Site Inspection Record: The provided text is merely the initial record of an on-site visit and hearing, detailing the date, location, parties present, and subject of the proceeding, but it does not contain any description of the underlying situation or the court's reasoning or final verdict on the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inspection locale audition des parties motif de révision direction des travaux procédure de planification procédure de taxation fiscale Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.1999.00080 · Lugano 22 febbraio 2000 · Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Tribunale della pianificazione del territorioTribunale d'appello

Verbale di sopralluogo/udienza

Sopralluogo del 22 febbraio 2000 a __________

Oggetto:

__________

Ricorrente: · __________ __________, __________,

Dinanzi ai giudici: · E. Beretta, Presidente Vicecancelliere · M. Pessina

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

Sono inoltre presenti: · - per il Municipio di __________

__________ __________. __________, __________ __________., __________ __________., __________., __________.

muncipali, __________ __________. segr. comunale, __________. . __________ e __________.

__________ pianificatore

- per il Consiglio di Stato __________. __________

- la ricorrente non è presente né rappresentata

Intimazione:

- ______ _______, __________

- Municipio di _____ _____________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona